Whole genome sequencing elucidates etiological differences in MCPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinoma

Carla Stephan1, Majd Al Assaad2, Max F Levine3

  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

PubMed

Insights

We sequenced two Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) cases lacking Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). One case showed aggressive progression with a SUFU gene rearrangement, while the other had a less aggressive course with TP53 and RB1 mutations.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer.
  • Pathogenesis involves immunosuppression, UV radiation, and Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV).
  • Understanding genetic drivers in MCPyV-negative MCC is crucial for targeted therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the genomic landscape of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-negative cases.
  • To identify potential driver mutations and signaling pathways involved in distinct clinical presentations of MCC.
  • To compare mutational profiles between MCC cases with differing clinical courses and outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Whole genome sequencing was performed on two Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) samples negative for Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV).
  • Comparative analysis of mutational profiles, including tumor mutational burden and specific mutation signatures (e.g., UV-signature mutations).
  • Identification and characterization of genetic alterations in key tumor suppressor and signaling pathway genes.

Main Results:

  • Case 1: Highly aggressive MCC, low tumor mutational burden, absence of UV-signature mutations, and a SUFU gene rearrangement implicated in Hedgehog pathway signaling.
  • Case 2: Less aggressive MCC, high tumor mutational burden, presence of UV-signature mutations, and mutations in TP53 and RB1 tumor suppressor genes.
  • Distinct genomic profiles correlate with differing clinical behaviors in MCPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinoma.

Conclusions:

  • Genomic heterogeneity significantly influences Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) progression, even in the absence of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV).
  • SUFU alterations represent a potential driver in aggressive, UV-mutation-negative MCC.
  • TP53 and RB1 mutations are associated with high mutational burden and UV-driven MCC, suggesting distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities.