Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Assessing Cardiac Reprogramming using High Content Imaging Analysis
Published on: October 26, 2020
Differentiating sensor changes in a composite heart failure ICD monitoring index: Clinical correlates and
Paolo Compagnucci1, Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono2, Antonio D'Onofrio3
1Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche," Ancona, Italy.
Insights
HeartLogic alerts predicting heart failure (HF) decompensation are primarily driven by heart sounds, but clinical events correlate more with respiration rate and night heart rate. Sensor changes vary with recurrent alerts, suggesting diverse HF progression mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- The HeartLogic algorithm utilizes implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) sensors to predict heart failure (HF) decompensation.
- Sensors include heart sounds (S1, S3), intrathoracic impedance, respiration rate, ratio of respiration rate to tidal volume (RSBI), and night heart rate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess relative changes in ICD sensors at HeartLogic alert onset.
- To determine associations between alerts, patient characteristics, and outcomes.
- To investigate sensor variability in recurrent alerts.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1200 HeartLogic alerts in 370 patients with HF and ICDs (n=568) across 26 centers.
- Median follow-up of 26 months, with alerts triggering patient contact and treatment.
- Correlation of sensor changes with patient characteristics (AF, CKD) and clinical outcomes (HF hospitalization, death).
Main Results:
- Heart sounds (S3, S3/S1) were the most frequent triggers for alerts (27%, 25%).
- Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) showed higher alert prevalence and rates.
- Clinical events (HF hospitalization/death) were associated with respiration rate/RSBI and night heart rate changes.
- Sensor changes varied in recurrent alerts (85%), and first alerts were more linked to clinical events (12.6%).
Conclusions:
- HeartLogic alerts are predominantly triggered by heart sound changes.
- Respiration rate, RSBI, and night heart rate are more indicative of clinical events.
- Variability in sensors for recurrent alerts highlights diverse HF progression pathways.
Background:
The HeartLogic algorithm (Boston Scientific, St Paul, MN) integrates data from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) sensors to predict heart failure (HF) decompensation: first (S1) and third (S3) heart sounds, intrathoracic impedance, respiration rate, ratio of respiration rate to tidal volume (RSBI), and night heart rate.
Objective:
This study assessed the relative changes in ICD sensors at the onset of HeartLogic alerts, their association with patient characteristics, and outcomes.
Methods:
The study included 568 patients with HF carrying ICDs (CRT-D, n = 410) across 26 centers, with a median follow-up of 26 months. HeartLogic alerts triggered patient contact and potential treatment.
Results:
A total of 1200 HeartLogic alerts were recorded in 370 patients. The sensor with the highest change at the alert's onset was S3 in 27% of alerts, followed by S3/S1 (25%). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at implantation had higher prevalence of alerts (AF, 84% vs no AF, 58%; CKD, 72% vs no CKD, 59%; P < .05) and rate (AF, 1.51 per patient-year vs no AF, 0.88 per patient-year; CKD, 1.30 per patient-year vs no CKD, 0.89 per patient-year; P < .05). During follow-up, 247 patients experienced more than 1 alert; in 85%, the sensor with the highest change varied between successive alerts. Of the 88 (7%) alerts associated with HF hospitalization or death, respiration rate or RSBI (11%, P = .007 vs S3/S1) and night heart rate (11%, P = .031 vs S3/S1) were more commonly the sensors showing the highest change. Clinical events were more common with the first alert (12.6%) than subsequent alerts (5.2%, P < .001).
Conclusion:
HeartLogic alerts are mostly triggered by changes in heart sounds, but clinical events are more linked to respiration rate, RSBI, and night heart rate. Recurrent alerts often involve different sensors, indicating diverse mechanisms of HF progression.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
12:12Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies