Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Maximizing Breast Cancer Detection Through Screening: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Approaches
1Huntsman Cancer Institute, Center for Quantitative Cancer Imaging, Salt Lake City, UT; University of Utah, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT.
Introduction/Background:
This study estimates the percentage of detectable breast cancers in the screening population that could be found with primary and supplemental screening, and provides cost estimates for population wide supplemental screening in the U.S.
Materials And Methods:
Published estimates on cancer detection rates of 2D mammography, tomosynthesis (DBT), whole breast ultrasound (US), molecular breast imaging (MBI), contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), and MRI, the number of mammograms conducted in the United States in 2023, and the proportion of dense breast tissue, were utilized. The maximum number of detectable cancers was projected from incremental cancer detection rates of the most sensitive supplemental screening method. The proportion of cancers detectable for each modality was calculated. In 2023, Medicare reimbursement rates were used to estimate supplemental screening costs.
Results:
Out of 469,437 detectable cancers, 2D mammography could detect 190,531 (41%), leaving 278,906 undetected. Adding supplemental screening could detect a combined 220,165 cancers (47%) with DBT, 237,596 (51%) with US, 331,727 (71%) with MBI, 377,049 (80%) with CEM and 469,437 (100%) with MRI. The imaging cost in US dollars to provide supplemental screening to all individuals with dense breasts in 2023 was $933M for tomosynthesis, $1.84B for US, $3.87B for CEM, $4.16B for MBI, and $6.36B for MRI.
Conclusion:
The study highlights potential benefits from supplemental breast cancer screening, suggesting the combination of mammography and breast MRI offers the most effective detection method though at the highest imaging cost. These findings provide valuable insights to guide future research and inform decision-making in supplemental breast cancer screening strategies.
More Related Videos
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
08:32Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020