Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025
Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Accelerated cardiac cine with spatio-coil regularized deep learning reconstruction
Omer Burak Demirel1, Fahime Ghanbari1, Manuel Antonio Morales1
1Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Purpose:
To develop an iterative deep learning (DL) reconstruction with spatio-coil regularization and multichannel k-space data consistency for accelerated cine imaging.
Methods:
This study proposes a Spatio-Coil Regularized DL (SCR-DL) approach for iterative deep learning reconstruction incorporating multicoil information in data consistency and regularizer. SCR-DL uses shift-invariant convolutional kernels to interpolate missing k-space lines and reconstruct individual coil images, followed by a regularizer that operates simultaneously across spatial and coil dimensions using learned image priors. At 8-fold acceleration, SCR-DL was compared with Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisition (GRAPPA), sensitivity encoding (SENSE)-based DL and spatio-temporal regularized (STR)-DL reconstruction. In the retrospective undersampled cine, images were quantitatively evaluated using normalized mean square error (NMSE) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Additionally, agreement for left-ventricular ejection fraction and left-ventricular mass were assessed using prospectively accelerated cine images at 2-fold and 8-fold accelerations.
Results:
The SCR-DL algorithm successfully reconstructed highly accelerated cine images. SCR-DL had significant improvements in NMSE (0.03 ± 0.02) and SSIM (91.4% ± 2.7%) compared with GRAPPA (NMSE: 0.09 ± 0.04, SSIM: 69.9% ± 11.1%; p < 0.001), SENSE-DL (NMSE: 0.07 ± 0.04, SSIM: 86.9% ± 3.2%; p < 0.001), and STR-DL (NMSE: 0.04 ± 0.03, SSIM: 90.0% ± 2.5%; p < 0.001) with retrospective undersampled cine. Despite the 3-fold reduction in scan time, there was no difference between left-ventricular ejection fraction (59.8 ± 4.5 vs. 60.8 ± 4.8, p = 0.46) or left-ventricular mass (73.6 ± 19.4 g vs. 73.2 ± 19.7 g, p = 0.95) between R = 2 and R = 8 prospectively accelerated cine images.
Conclusions:
SCR-DL enabled highly accelerated cardiac cine imaging, significantly reducing breath-hold time. Compared with GRAPPA or SENSE-DL, images reconstructed with SCR-DL showed superior NMSE and SSIM.
