Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Major clinical outcomes in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
Paschalis Karakasis1, Konstantinos Pamporis2, Konstantinos C Siontis3
1Second Department of Cardiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Insights
Symptom status in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients did not significantly impact major clinical outcomes like stroke or mortality. However, asymptomatic individuals showed a higher risk of progressing to permanent AF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
- Atrial Fibrillation Management
Background:
- Current guidelines link asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) to higher risks of stroke and mortality than symptomatic AF.
- Conflicting recent evidence necessitates a re-evaluation of symptom status and clinical outcomes in AF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between symptom status and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation.
- To clarify the prognostic implications of symptomatic versus asymptomatic atrial fibrillation.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases.
- Triple-independent study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed.
- Random-effects meta-analyses were employed to pool evidence from 36 studies involving 217,850 participants.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, thromboembolism, stroke, hospitalization, or myocardial infarction were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic AF patients.
- Symptomatic patients had a 33% increased risk of new-onset heart failure and a 30% lower risk of progression to permanent AF.
- Symptomatic patients were more likely to receive antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation therapy.
Conclusions:
- Major clinical outcomes did not significantly differ based on AF symptom status.
- Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation patients demonstrated a greater hazard of progression to permanent AF.
Background And Aims:
Current guidelines suggest that asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) is independently associated with increased risks of stroke and mortality compared with symptomatic AF. Considering that recent investigations have provided conflicting results, the present study aimed to evaluate the association between symptom status and clinical outcomes in patients with AF.
Methods:
Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched until 25 March 2024. Triple-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.
Results:
Thirty-six studies (217 850 participants) were included. Based on the frequentist analysis, symptomatic individuals had no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) .97, 95% confidence interval (CI) .80-1.17], cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI .72-1.49), thromboembolism (HR 1.06, 95% CI .87-1.28), stroke (HR 1.06, 95% CI .84-1.34), hospitalization (HR 1.34, 95% CI .89-2.02), and myocardial infarction (HR .98, 95% CI .70-1.36), compared to the asymptomatic group. Symptomatic patients had a 33% increased risk of new-onset heart failure (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19-1.49) and a 30% lower risk of progression to permanent AF (HR .70, 95% CI .54-.89). The Bayesian analysis yielded comparable results, yet the association between symptom status and new-onset heart failure was not significant (HR 1.27, 95% credible interval .76-1.93; Bayes factor = 1.2). Symptomatic patients had higher odds of receiving antiarrhythmic drugs (odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.33-2.03) and ablation therapy (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06-2.05) compared to asymptomatic cases.
Conclusions:
The risk of major clinical outcomes did not differ between individuals with and without AF-related symptoms. Asymptomatic patients had a greater hazard of progression to permanent AF.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical manifestations and prevention
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

