Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
Clinical Significance of the Control CT Rotterdam Score Compared With the Admission CT Rotterdam Score in Patients
Dragan Švraka1, Anita Djurdjevic Svraka2,3, Vlado Djajic4
1Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, University Clinical Center of Republic of Srpska/University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, BIH.
Background:
The Rotterdam scale is one of the most commonly used radiological scales for evaluating and predicting outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases. Given the evolving nature of TBI, our study is designed to compare the Rotterdam score of computed tomography (CT) findings upon admission (Rotterdam score I) with the score after 72 hours (Rotterdam score II) of treatment in the trauma intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods:
A retrospective observational study was conducted on 54 patients who received intensive care treatment for isolated severe TBI over five years. We included severe TBI patients with no age restrictions who required admission to the ICU within 12 hours of the onset of trauma. An initial Rotterdam CT score was obtained via a CT head scan within four hours of the trauma, followed by a control CT head scan 72 hours after ICU admission. It was essential to have documentation on the clinical and laboratory treatment course and access to radiological CT diagnostics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed in this study to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic tests, such as the Rotterdam score. The ROC curves provided a graphical representation of the tests' diagnostic performance, which helped assess their effectiveness.
Results:
There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the diagnostic scores of CT scans upon admission (Rotterdam score I) and control CT scans after 72 hours (Rotterdam score II) in the total sample. The Rotterdam score I was notably higher, 3.6 (±0.8), in patients requiring neurosurgical intervention compared to those who did not, 2.8 (±0.9), with significance (p = 0.003). The Rotterdam score I demonstrated a substantial predictive value for unfavorable outcomes (p = 0.048), as did the Rotterdam score II after the 72-hour mark (p = 0.006).
Conclusion:
The control Rotterdam score 72 hours after admission predicts mortality in isolated TBI patients more significantly than the Rotterdam score determined at the patient's admission to the intensive care unit.
