Serum tumor markers and outcomes in lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Baseline serum tumor markers (STMs), including CYFRA21-1, CEA, and NSE, are vital prognostic factors for lung cancer with brain metastases (BM). Dynamic STM changes during treatment do not independently predict survival outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Biomarkers
- Clinical Research
Background
- Serum tumor markers (STMs) are utilized for cancer diagnosis and surveillance.
- The prognostic value of STMs in lung cancer with brain metastases (BM) remains unclear.
- This study investigates the role of baseline STMs and their dynamic changes in predicting survival for BM patients.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of baseline serum tumor markers (STMs) in patients with lung cancer and brain metastases (BM).
- To assess whether dynamic changes in STMs during disease progression impact patient survival.
- To identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival in lung cancer with BM.
Main Methods
- Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 1,169 lung cancer patients with BM.
- Analysis of serum tumor marker (STM) data collected during the disease course.
- Latent class growth mixed modeling (LCGMM) to identify STM trajectory groups.
- Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models to assess survival correlations.
Main Results
- Baseline CYFRA21-1, CEA, and NSE levels were significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in BM patients.
- For NSCLC with BM, baseline CYFRA21-1, CEA, NSE, and driver gene status were prognostic.
- For SCLC with BM, baseline NSE and chemotherapy were prognostic; dynamic STM changes lacked independent prognostic significance.
Conclusions
- Baseline CYFRA21-1, CEA, and NSE levels, along with driver gene status, are recommended for assessing outcomes in BM patients.
- Dynamic changes in STMs throughout the disease course were not found to be independent predictors of patient outcomes.
- Prognostic evaluation should prioritize baseline biomarker levels and genetic factors over dynamic STM trends.

