Evaluating the current breadth of randomized control trials on cardiac arrest: A scoping review

Jake Toy1,2,3,4, Lauren Friend5, Kelsey Wilhelm2,3,4

  • 1Los Angeles County EMS Agency Santa Fe Springs California USA.

Abstract

Insights

Cardiac arrest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) saw no increase from 2015-2022. Research gaps exist in in-hospital and pediatric cardiac arrest studies, despite the significant disease burden.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Research
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Cardiac arrest presents a significant global health challenge.
  • There is a notable lack of robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to guide clinical management strategies.
  • Evaluating the landscape of existing RCTs is crucial for identifying research gaps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the scope and trends of cardiac arrest RCTs published between 2015 and 2022.
  • To identify potential research gaps in the field of cardiac arrest management.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2023 across MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science.
  • Included studies were RCTs published from 2015 to 2022 involving human subjects with non-traumatic cardiac arrest.
  • Descriptive statistics and the Mann Kendall test were used to analyze publication trends and trial characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Eighty-seven RCTs were included, with no significant annual increase in publications observed (p=1.0).
  • Denmark and the United States led in trial contributions. Most trials focused on adult, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
  • Interventions included process improvements, drugs, and devices, with similar application in prehospital and ICU settings, and during intra- and post-arrest periods. Survival at ≥28 days was a common primary outcome.

Conclusions:

  • The number of published cardiac arrest RCTs remained stable between 2015 and 2022.
  • Significant research gaps were identified, particularly concerning in-hospital cardiac arrest and pediatric populations.
  • Further research is needed to address these understudied areas in cardiac arrest management.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
121
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management01:25

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

Pharmacologic intervention is crucial in treating cardiac arrest patients during ACLS or Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support. The ACLS algorithms guide the administration of specific drugs based on the patient's cardiac arrest rhythm, which includes pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), asystole, and pulseless electrical activity (PEA).EpinephrineIndication: Epinephrine is the first-line drug for all cardiac arrest rhythms.Mechanism of Action: Epinephrine...
1
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
91