Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Evaluating the current breadth of randomized control trials on cardiac arrest: A scoping review
Jake Toy1,2,3,4, Lauren Friend5, Kelsey Wilhelm2,3,4
1Los Angeles County EMS Agency Santa Fe Springs California USA.
Objectives:
Despite the significant disease burden due to cardiac arrest, there is a relative paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to inform definitive management. We aimed to evaluate the current scope of cardiac arrest RCTs published between 2015 and 2022.
Methods:
We conducted a search in October 2023 of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for cardiac arrest RCTs. We included trials published between 2015 and 2022 enrolling human subjects suffering from non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Descriptive statistics were reported and the Mann Kendall test was used to evaluate for temporal trends in the number of trials published annually.
Results:
We identified 1764 unique publications, 87 RCTs were included after title/abstract and full-text review. We found no significant increase in trials published annually (eight in 2015 and 16 in 2022, p = 1.0). Geographic analysis of study centers found 31 countries represented; Denmark (n = 13, 15%) and the United States (n = 9, 10%) conducted the majority of trials. Nearly all trials included adults (n = 84, 97%) and few included children (n = 9, 10%). The majority of trials focused on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n = 62, 71%). Thirty-eight (44%) trials used an intervention characterized as a process improvement; 28 (32%) interventions were characterized as a drug and 20 (23%) as a device. Interventions were implemented with similar frequency in the prehospital (33%) and intensive care unit (38%) setting, as well as similarly between the intra-arrest (53%) and post-arrest (46%) periods. Twenty (27%) trials selected a primary outcome of survival at ≥ 28 days.
Conclusions:
Publication of cardiac arrest RCTs remained constant between 2015 and 2022. We identified significant gaps including a lack of trials examining in-hospital cardiac arrest and pediatric patients.
Insights
Cardiac arrest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) saw no increase from 2015-2022. Research gaps exist in in-hospital and pediatric cardiac arrest studies, despite the significant disease burden.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
- Public Health
Background:
- Cardiac arrest presents a significant global health challenge.
- There is a notable lack of robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to guide clinical management strategies.
- Evaluating the landscape of existing RCTs is crucial for identifying research gaps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the scope and trends of cardiac arrest RCTs published between 2015 and 2022.
- To identify potential research gaps in the field of cardiac arrest management.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2023 across MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science.
- Included studies were RCTs published from 2015 to 2022 involving human subjects with non-traumatic cardiac arrest.
- Descriptive statistics and the Mann Kendall test were used to analyze publication trends and trial characteristics.
Main Results:
- Eighty-seven RCTs were included, with no significant annual increase in publications observed (p=1.0).
- Denmark and the United States led in trial contributions. Most trials focused on adult, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
- Interventions included process improvements, drugs, and devices, with similar application in prehospital and ICU settings, and during intra- and post-arrest periods. Survival at ≥28 days was a common primary outcome.
Conclusions:
- The number of published cardiac arrest RCTs remained stable between 2015 and 2022.
- Significant research gaps were identified, particularly concerning in-hospital cardiac arrest and pediatric populations.
- Further research is needed to address these understudied areas in cardiac arrest management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

