Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025
Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Clinical impact of large genomic explorations at diagnosis in 198 pediatric solid tumors: a monocentric study aiming
Juliette Simon1, Damien Reita2,3, Eric Guerin2,3
1Pediatric Onco-Hematology Department, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, Strasbourg, France.
Introduction:
Faced to the growing development of collecting systematic molecular analyses in relapsed pediatric cancers to transform their targeted matched therapies, this study aimed to assess the clinical and therapeutic indications of systematic diagnostic genomic explorations performed in pediatric solid cancers to determine which type of screening and if it afford at relapse time an accurate targeted strategy.
Methods:
A total of 280 patients less than 22 years, referred at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg for a newly diagnosed solid tumor from January 2015 to December 2021, were prospectively genomically investigated since diagnosis. Using 7 different molecular tests going from single-gene methods (IHC, FISH, RT-PCR, Sanger sequencing, droplet digital PCR) to largescale analyses (Next-Generation sequencing, RNAsequencing and FoundationOne®CDx), we explored retrospectively the molecular findings in those pediatric solid tumors (except hematolymphoid cancers) to improve diagnosis, prognosis assessment and relapse therapeutics.
Results:
One hundred and ninety-eight patients (71%) underwent molecular biology (MB) at diagnosis. Thirty-eight different histologies were grouped into cerebral tumors (30%), sarcomas (26%, bone and soft tissues), various blastomas (27%), and other entities (17%). Over a median 40-month follow-up, the overall survival rate of patients was 85% and the relapse rate 28%. Of the 326 analyses carried out, 245 abnormalities (single nucleotide variations: 50%, fusions: 25%, copy number alteration: 20%) concerning 70 oncogenes were highlighted. The overall clinical impact rate was 84%. Broad-spectrum analyses had a higher therapeutic impact (57%) than the targeted analyses (28%). 75% of broad-spectrum tests found an actionable variant conducting 23% of patients to receive rapidly a matched targeted therapy since first relapse.
Conclusion:
Our experience highlighted the clinical utility of molecular profiling of solid tumors as soon as at diagnosis in children to expect improving access to innovative agents at relapse.
