Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Sources of Law

Sources of Law

Laws form the essential rules set by governing authorities to shape and control societal behavior. In nursing, laws guide actions, safeguard patient rights, define nurses' scope of practice, and maintain professional standards. Understanding the legal framework governing nursing involves recognizing four primary sources of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative (regulatory), and common law.
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...

Concepts of Health and Illness

Concepts of Health and Illness

Health is a condition of the body, mind, and spirit where an individual remains free from illness. Similarly, wellness is an active state, including living a lifestyle that promotes physical, mental, and emotional health. Physical health is critical for the overall well-being and can be affected by lifestyle, activity level, diet, and behavior. The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental and universal human right. Consider Lisa, a fifteen-year-old born with congenital...

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

Torts III

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Prohibited AI Practices in Healthcare under the European Artificial Intelligence Act.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Same journal

Probing the Prevalence of Pharmaceutical Corruption.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Same journal

Regulatory Guidance for the Return of Raw Genomic Data to Research Participants: A Qualitative Interview Study.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Same journal

Supported Decision-Making and the Inclusion of People who Lack Decisional Capacity in Greater than Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Same journal

Using Supported Decision-Making to Promote Value-Aligned Research Participation.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Same journal

Intellectual Disability and Supported Decision-Making in Clinical Research: Anticipating Ethical Challenges.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Rethinking Health Law Architecture.

¹EMORY UNIVERSITY, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, USA.

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

|October 22, 2024

Summary

Current health law frameworks, focusing on individual rights or vulnerable groups, are inadequate for modern healthcare challenges. A broader population health approach is needed to balance individual liberties with community well-being.

Keywords:

Health Care Regulation Health Law Health Policy Public Health Public Health Emergencies

More Related Videos

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System

Published on: December 11, 2016

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

Area of Science:

Public Health Law
Health Policy Analysis
Bioethics

Background:

Existing health law frameworks, including individualistic and vulnerable populations approaches, are insufficient to address contemporary healthcare issues.
These traditional legal structures create conflicts between individual and population needs and present challenges in care qualification.
Inherent contradictions within statutes often arise from attempting to reconcile these competing interests.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the limitations of current health law paradigms in addressing complex healthcare problems.
To propose a new legal framework for population health that balances individual autonomy with collective well-being.
To advocate for a shift from a vulnerable populations approach to a broader population health strategy.

Main Methods:

Legal analysis of existing health statutes and regulatory frameworks.
Comparative analysis of individualistic versus population-based health approaches.
Ethical review of liberty interests versus community health imperatives.

Main Results:

Individualistic and vulnerable populations approaches create irreconcilable conflicts in health law.
Current legal structures fail to adequately address global health challenges and equity in care access.
A broader population approach is legally and ethically superior for managing contemporary health concerns.

Conclusions:

A new population health legal paradigm is essential for effective healthcare governance.
This approach must respect individual choice while prioritizing community health outcomes.
Moving beyond the vulnerable populations model is critical for global health equity and sustainability.