Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Model to Study the Systemic and Local Dynamics of CD8+ T Cells During LN Metastasis
Published on: January 26, 2024
Meta-analysis of prediction models for predicting lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer
Feng Liu1, Fei Han1, Lifang Lu1
1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, 031000, Shanxi Province, China.
Background:
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although prior studies have investigated the potential of ML in this context, the current evidence is not sufficiently strong. Hence, we undertook a thorough analysis to ascertain the predictive accuracy of different ML models and their practical relevance in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients.
Materials And Methods:
In our search, we thoroughly examined PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, encompassing their complete database history until December 3rd, 2022. To evaluate the potential bias in the machine learning models documented in the included studies, we employed the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
Results:
A total of 107 studies, involving 136,245 patients, were included. Among them, 21,231 patients showed central LNM (CLNM) and 4,637 had lateral LNM (LLNM). The meta-analysis results revealed that the c-index for predicting LNM, CLNM, and LLNM were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.773-0.834) in the training set, and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.754-0.791), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.779-0.879) in the validation set, respectively. A total of 134 machine learning-based prediction models were included, covering 10 different types. Logistic Regression (LR) was the most commonly used model, accounting for 81.34% (109/134) of the included models.
Conclusions:
Machine learning methods have shown a certain level of accuracy in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients, indicating their potential as a predictive tool. Their use in the clinical management of PTC holds great promise. Among the various ML models investigated, the performance of logistic regression-based nomograms was deemed satisfactory.

