Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Labeling Emotion01:20

Labeling Emotion

113
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
113
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion01:20

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

294
Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
294
Emotional Expression01:26

Emotional Expression

182
Emotional expression encompasses how individuals convey their emotions through verbal communication and non-verbal cues. These non-verbal actions include facial expressions, body language, and physical gestures, such as frowning or smiling. Among these, facial expressions play a crucial role in emotional expression and are understood universally, indicating a biological basis for how humans communicate emotions.
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
182
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

132
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
132
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.5K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Effects of Commas and Line Breaks in Relative Clause Attachment.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Emoji-Dis: A dataset of emojis characterised in 13 discrete emotions.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

The influence of individual differences in the processing of words expressing discrete emotions: data from a large-scale study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

What makes a word a good representative of the category of "emotion"? The role of feelings and interoception.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2023
Same author

Emotional Prototypicality Ratings for 636 Chinese Words: A Database of Chinese Words with Affective Information.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2023
Same author

CROWD-5e: A Croatian psycholinguistic database of affective norms for five discrete emotions.

Behavior research methods·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K

Exploring the differences in processing between Chinese emotion and emotion-laden words: A cross-task comparison

Ruiyao Zheng1, Meng Zhang2, Marc Guasch1

  • 1Departament de Psicologia and CRAMC, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|October 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Researchers found that people process emotion words (EM words) faster than emotion-laden words (EL words). This processing advantage for EM words was particularly noticeable in tasks requiring emotional categorization, especially for negative words.

Keywords:
Emotion wordsaffective categorisation taskemotion-laden wordslexical decision taskvalence

More Related Videos

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.6K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K
Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.6K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Semantics

Background:

  • Affective words are categorized as emotion words (EM words) or emotion-laden words (EL words).
  • Previous research on processing differences between EM and EL words yielded inconclusive results.
  • EM words have inherent affective denotative meaning, while EL words carry affective connotative meaning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate processing differences between Chinese EM and EL words.
  • To examine the influence of task type (implicit vs. explicit) and word valence (positive vs. negative) on processing.
  • To explore the relationship between representational differences and processing efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a lexical decision task (LDT) for implicit processing and an affective categorization task (ACT) for explicit processing.
  • Tested both positive and negative EM and EL words in Chinese.
  • Measured response times to assess processing speed.

Main Results:

  • Participants responded significantly faster to EM words compared to EL words.
  • This processing advantage for EM words was more pronounced in the ACT (explicit task).
  • The advantage was particularly evident for negative EM words.

Conclusions:

  • EM words are processed more efficiently than EL words, supporting distinct representational differences.
  • The explicit relevance of affective content enhances the processing advantage of EM words.
  • Findings suggest that the inherent affective nature of EM words influences cognitive processing.