Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Extrapolated cross-validation for randomized ensembles
Jin-Hong Du1,2, Pratik Patil3, Kathryn Roeder1
1Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
Abstract:
Ensemble methods such as bagging and random forests are ubiquitous in various fields, from finance to genomics. Despite their prevalence, the question of the efficient tuning of ensemble parameters has received relatively little attention. This paper introduces a cross-validation method, ECV (Extrapolated Cross-Validation), for tuning the ensemble and subsample sizes in randomized ensembles. Our method builds on two primary ingredients: initial estimators for small ensemble sizes using out-of-bag errors and a novel risk extrapolation technique that leverages the structure of prediction risk decomposition. By establishing uniform consistency of our risk extrapolation technique over ensemble and subsample sizes, we show that ECV yields -optimal (with respect to the oracle-tuned risk) ensembles for squared prediction risk. Our theory accommodates general predictors, only requires mild moment assumptions, and allows for high-dimensional regimes where the feature dimension grows with the sample size. As a practical case study, we employ ECV to predict surface protein abundances from gene expressions in single-cell multiomics using random forests under a computational constraint on the maximum ensemble size. Compared to sample-split and -fold cross-validation, ECV achieves higher accuracy by avoiding sample splitting. Meanwhile, its computational cost is considerably lower owing to the use of the risk extrapolation technique.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Random Sampling Method
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Random and Systematic Errors
Estimating Population Standard Deviation

