Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Blast Quantification Using Hopkinson Pressure Bars
Published on: July 5, 2016
Assessment of a 12-story Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frame Building Using Performance-Based Seismic
Mustafa K Buniya1, Andre R Barbosa2, Siamak Sattar3
1School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. He is on a scholarship program sponsored by the Higher Committee for Education Development in Iraq (HCED). He received his BSCE from University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq, and his MSCE from University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. His research interests include performance-based seismic design of the reinforced concrete buildings.
None:
A 160-foot (≈ 49 m) tall 12-story reinforced concrete special moment frame building is designed following ASCE 7-16 and ACI 318-14, and assessed using three Performance-Based Seismic Engineering (PBSE) standards and guidelines including ASCE/SEI 41, the Tall Buildings Initiative (TBI) guidelines for performance-based design of tall buildings, and the Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council (LATBSDC) procedures. The assessments are performed at the combination of two performance and hazard levels including Collapse Prevention (CP) at the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCER) hazard level and Immediate Occupancy (IO) at a frequent ground motion level with 50 percent probability of exceedance in 30 years, i.e. serviceability performance level. Based on the recommendations of each of the three PBSE documents, nonlinear finite element models are implemented in OpenSees. Through nonlinear time-history response analyses, the finite element models are subjected to eleven ground motions that are selected following the ground motion selection recommendations in ASCE 7-16. Assessment results indicate that for the serviceability performance level, the code-compliant building meets the design requirements of the three PBSE documents for the interstory drift ratio and inelastic deformation of the structural components. At the MCER hazard level, although the building essentially satisfies the design requirements for the peak interstory drift ratios and inelastic deformation, the mean of the residual interstory drift ratios as well as the envelope of the residual drift ratios do not meet the limits of the TBI and LATBSDC guidelines. The results indicate that the newly designed building meets the ASCE 41 acceptance criteria but does not meet the design requirements set in TBI and LATBSDC guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Indeterminate Structure
Method of Superposition
When applying the method of superposition, each type of load—whether...
Frames: Problem Solving II
Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...
Design of Prismatic Beams for Bending

