An Approach for Combining Clinical Judgment with Machine Learning to Inform Medical Decision Making: Analysis of
S Moler-Zapata1, A Hutchings1, R Grieve1
1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Machine learning (ML) can personalize treatment decisions by combining clinical judgment with ML methods. This approach generates comparative effectiveness evidence, improving trust and usefulness for clinical decision-making in complex patient groups.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Decision Support
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) offers potential for identifying treatment effect heterogeneity but faces barriers in interpretability and usability for clinical decision-making.
- Integrating clinical judgment with ML is crucial for developing transparent and trustworthy evidence for personalized medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and illustrate a 4-stage approach combining clinical judgment with ML for generating comparative effectiveness evidence.
- To enhance the relevance and usefulness of ML-driven insights for clinical decision-making, particularly for patients with multiple long-term conditions.
Main Methods:
- A 4-stage approach was developed, incorporating clinical judgment to identify modifying factors of treatment effectiveness.
- Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) ML was applied to large-scale administrative data (N=24,312) to select covariates from over 500 possibilities.
- Estimates of comparative effectiveness were generated for relevant patient subgroups, with results presented via an interactive visualization tool.
Main Results:
- Non-emergency surgery (NES) strategies for acute appendicitis showed increased days alive and out-of-hospital compared to emergency surgery (ES) overall.
- Treatment effects varied significantly across subgroups, with notable differences observed in patients with chronic heart failure and kidney disease versus those with cancer and hypertension.
- An interactive tool was developed to visualize ML outputs, allowing customization for specific clinical decision-maker needs.
Conclusions:
- Combining clinical judgment with ML provides a principled approach to enhance the trust, relevance, and utility of comparative effectiveness evidence.
- The developed method effectively generates clinically relevant subgroup evidence, supporting personalized decision-making for patients with multiple long-term conditions.
- Interactive visualization tools can improve the accessibility and application of complex ML findings in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
