Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Masculinizing Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery: Validation of the GENDER-Q Chest Scales.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Year-long cumulative effect assessment of water quality and sludge reduction in Jayanti Ki Rao channel through strategized biological treatment using principal component analysis-a case study.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same author

Battle of the Brands: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrices.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Impact of operative time on 30-day surgical outcomes following tissue expander-based breast reconstruction.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Further Validation of the GENDER-Q Voice Sound and Voice Distress Scales in 5424 Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults: An Examination of Construct Validity.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

Functional Outcomes in Patients with Hand Burns Receiving Long-Term Occupational Hand Therapy: A Burn Unit's 10-Year Experience.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Processing of Human Reduction Mammoplasty and Mastectomy Tissues for Cell Culture
13:08

Processing of Human Reduction Mammoplasty and Mastectomy Tissues for Cell Culture

Published on: January 3, 2013

16.5K

Resection Weight Formulas for Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review and Regression Analysis.

Nisha Gupta1, Christian X Lava, Sami Ferdousian1

  • 1From the Georgetown University School of Medicine.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|October 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Existing formulas for estimating reduction mammoplasty resection weight are unreliable for surgical planning. This study found current methods lack accuracy, necessitating new approaches for better patient outcomes and insurance coverage.

More Related Videos

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

2.5K
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Processing of Human Reduction Mammoplasty and Mastectomy Tissues for Cell Culture
13:08

Processing of Human Reduction Mammoplasty and Mastectomy Tissues for Cell Culture

Published on: January 3, 2013

16.5K
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

2.5K
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of resection weight in reduction mammoplasty (RM) is crucial for surgical planning and predicting outcomes.
  • Current formulas for estimating resection weight have limitations, complicating insurance approvals and precise surgical planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of commonly used formulas for estimating resection weight in reduction mammoplasty.
  • To compare calculated resection weights using existing formulas against actual weights in a large patient cohort.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search identified relevant studies on reduction mammoplasty.
  • Regression analysis was performed on a cohort of 1128 reduction mammoplasty patients to assess the accuracy of five common formulas (Appel, Boukovalas, Descamps, Eder, Kocak).
  • Calculated resection weights were compared to actual resection weights, with R-squared values determined for different formula applications.

Main Results:

  • Analysis included 14 manuscripts encompassing 2232 patients (3320 breasts).
  • Regression analyses in the study cohort showed low R-squared values for all tested formulas, indicating poor correlation between calculated and actual resection weights.
  • Specific R-squared values varied between formulas and patient groups (e.g., >500g vs. <500g resections), with some formulas yielding indeterminate results.

Conclusions:

  • Existing formulas for estimating reduction mammoplasty resection weight are not accurate and are unreliable for surgical planning.
  • The observed inaccuracies may stem from formulas being tailored to specific surgical techniques or cohorts.
  • Further research is needed to develop more reliable methods for predicting resection weight in reduction mammoplasty.