Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Demonstration of physicochemical and functional similarity between Stimufend (pegfilgrastim-fpgk) and Neulasta
Alison Sykes1, Louise Ingram1, Ulrich Kronthaler1
1Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim GmbH, Eysins, Switzerland.
Background:
Pegfilgrastim is a long-acting recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor biologic that is indicated to reduce the incidence of infections, manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients receiving myelosuppressive anti-cancer drugs and to increase survival in patients acutely exposed to myelosuppressive doses of radiation. Due to the high cost of biologic therapy and the scarcity of biosimilar alternatives, there is an unmet medical need for targeted biologics.
Objective:
This comparative analytical investigation aimed to confirm the similarity of biosimilar Stimufend® (pegfilgrastim-fpgk) to reference product Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim).
Methods:
The analysis was designed using state-of-the-art orthogonal techniques and side-by-side testing to compare the physicochemical and biological properties of these two products. The measured quality attributes included the primary structure and higher order structure of the molecule, purity/impurity profiles, product variants, process-related impurities, composition, content, and biological activity. The statistical analysis was based on risk ranking of the critical quality attributes (very low, low, moderate, high, very high), and scientific considerations in combination with the characteristics of the assay (sensitivity, selectivity, and variability). In addition, non-quantitative parameters were compared using a descriptive assessment of the product profile. Analytical similarity was concluded by quality attributes falling within the defined range of the originator product.
Results:
The results of this study confirm that Stimufend® is biosimilar to Neulasta® for all measured quality attributes. There are no clinically significant differences between Stimufend® and Neulasta®, which was confirmed by the marketing approval for Stimufend® by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study provide robust evidence supporting the structural and functional biosimilarity between Stimufend® and Neulasta®.
More Related Videos
12:27Author Spotlight: Balancing Speed, Cost, and Accuracy in Neutrophil Function Assessment with NeutroFun Screen Protocol
Published on: February 9, 2024
05:24Two Flow Cytometric Approaches of NKG2D Ligand Surface Detection to Distinguish Stem Cells from Bulk Subpopulations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: February 21, 2021