Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Collecting Marine Gnathiid Isopod Fish Parasites with Light Traps
Published on: September 25, 2023
Ecological and phylogenetic components of flatfish ectoparasites (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) from the
Lilia C Soler-Jiménez1, Frank A Ocaña1,2, David I Hernández-Mena3
1Aquatic Pathology Laboratory, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN) Unidad Mérida, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Abstract:
For many years, parasite ecologists have debated the relative importance of phylogeny and ecology as drivers of parasite community structure. Here, we address this issue using data on the metazoan ectoparasite communities of different flatfish species. Twenty species of flatfish were collected along the continental shelf of the Southern Gulf of Mexico and examined for ectoparasites. Eight flatfish species were parasitized by at least one ectoparasite species. In total, 326 ectoparasites, representing 11 species (4 monogeneans, 4 copepods, 1 isopod, 1 branchiurid, and 1 leech) were removed from 1622 hosts examined. The highest prevalence (37.5%) occurred in Bomolochus sp1 from Trinectes maculatus, while the lower (0.1%) for Argulus sp., Gnathia sp. and Trachellobdella lubrica from Cyclopsetta chittendeni. Changes in the ectoparasite community structure per host species and region were evaluated using a Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance and represented by a multidimensional scaling analysis. Significant differences in the parasite species composition among regions and hosts were detected, but no significant interaction between regions and hosts occurred. A multivariate pairwise t-test detected significant differences in the parasite infracommunities between the Yucatan Shelf and the other two regions; in addition, significant differences were detected between C. chittendeni and the Syacium species as well as between Ancylopsetta dilecta and Syacium papillosum. In this case, there is no relationship between the patterns of ectoparasitic community structure and the inherent phylogenetic affinity of the hosts; instead, the variations in ectoparasitic communities are determined by a regional ecological component.
More Related Videos
06:42Raising the Mexican Tetra Astyanax mexicanus for Analysis of Post-larval Phenotypes and Whole-mount Immunohistochemistry
Published on: December 28, 2018
03:46Author Spotlight: Coproparasitoscopic Examination of Dog Stools for Control and Prevention of Zoonotic Parasite Diseases
Published on: December 15, 2023