Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Shared parameter modeling of longitudinal data allowing for possibly informative visiting process and terminal event.
Christos Thomadakis1,2, Loukia Meligkotsidou2, Nikos Pantazis1
1Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Athens, 115 27, Greece.
Ignoring informative visiting processes in joint models can bias longitudinal marker estimates. This study proposes a unified approach that accounts for the visiting process, improving accuracy in time-to-event analyses.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Longitudinal Data Analysis
- Survival Analysis
Background:
- Shared parameter models (SPMs) jointly analyze longitudinal and time-to-event data but often assume non-informative visiting processes.
- Informative visiting processes, where observation times depend on patient history, can bias SPM estimates.
- Current methods typically assume conditional independence between marker, visiting, and event processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a unified, flexible approach for jointly modeling longitudinal markers, informative visiting processes, and competing risks time-to-event data.
- To assess the impact of informative visiting processes on parameter estimation in joint models.
- To evaluate the robustness of different visiting process formulations (gap time vs. calendar time).
Main Methods:
- A novel joint model is proposed, conditioning on marker history, visit times, and random effects.
- The model accommodates both gap time and calendar time scales for the visiting process.
- Competing risks are incorporated into the time-to-event component.
- Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate performance.
Main Results:
- Disregarding an informative visiting process leads to significantly biased marker estimates.
- Misspecification of the visiting process also introduces bias.
- The gap time formulation demonstrates greater robustness to misspecification than the intensity-based model.
- Including prior visit history in the visiting process model improves estimation accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Informative visiting processes are critical and should be explicitly modeled in joint analyses.
- The proposed unified approach provides a flexible and robust framework for joint modeling.
- Accurate modeling of the visiting process is essential for reliable inference in longitudinal and survival data analysis.
- The methodology is successfully applied to HIV longitudinal data with variable visit frequencies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Residence Time
After the administration of a drug through intravenous bolus injection, the drug molecules are distributed throughout the body and remain there for varying periods. The MRT represents the average time these drug molecules stay in the...

