Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain PPOP
Published on: January 27, 2010
Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different
Ruchika Pandey1, Nitin Kararia1, Deepak Kumar Sharma2
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, NIMS Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Aims:
A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate postoperative pain and investigate periapical healing after root canal treatment using eugenol, resin-based, and calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs) sealers.
Materials And Methods:
Sixty-three individuals diagnosed with apical periodontitis confirmed using cold test and electronic pulp tester, periapical pathology with periapical index score of 2 or more, previous endodontic treatment failure exhibiting a visual analog scale pain score of 3 or above, were enrolled in this investigation. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups and following biomechanical preparation, the canals were obturated using Meta CeraSeal, AH plus, and eugenol-based sealers. Postprocedural pain intensity was assessed at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days, while periapical healing was evaluated at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical analysis was done using the Chi-square and Friedman's test.
Results:
The mean of periapical lesions for Meta CeraSeal (4.7, 1.6), AH Plus (4.68, 3.19), 24 and eugenol-based (2.66, 1.75) at 3 months and 6 months, respectively. The mean & std. deviation of pain scores at 24 h for Meta CeraSeal (0.62 ± 1.857), AH Plus (1.62 ± 1.962), and eugenol-based (0.48 ± 1.250). At 48 h for Meta CeraSeal (0.33 ± 1.528), AH Plus (1.33 ± 1.798). On the 7th day, Meta CeraSeal (0.24 ± 1.091) and AH Plus (0.71 ± 1.384) for eugenol-based at 48 h, and on the 7th day, none of the patients had pain. Evaluation of the apical sealer puff displayed no suggestive variations (P = 0.634). Notably, no analgesics were taken.
Conclusions:
No suggestive dissimilarity was noted between eugenol, resin-based, and CSBSs sealers.

