Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

05:56
Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
Published on: April 14, 2023
2.4K
Comparative Analysis of AI Models for Atypical Pigmented Facial Lesion Diagnosis
Alessandra Cartocci1, Alessio Luschi2, Linda Tognetti1
1Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 25, 2024
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) models, including logistic regression and deep learning (CNNs), show promise in improving the diagnosis of atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs). These AI tools can aid dermatologists in accurately identifying malignant versus benign skin conditions.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Diagnosing atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs) is challenging for dermatologists, with visual assessment playing a critical role.
- Inaccurate diagnoses can lead to mismanagement and potential patient harm.
- AI offers potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making in dermatology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of machine learning (logistic regression) and deep learning (CNN) models for dermoscopic diagnosis of aPFLs.
- To assess AI's role in managing aPFLs by analyzing diagnostic accuracy against dermatologists' assessments.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1197 dermoscopic images of excised facial lesions, classified into seven categories (LM, LMM, AN, PAK, SL, SK, SLK).
- Development and comparison of logistic regression models (lesion features and metadata) and CNN models (image analysis).
- Stratified analysis of dermatologists' diagnostic accuracy compared to AI model performance on a test set.
Main Results:
- Dermatologists achieved 71.2% accuracy differentiating malignant from benign lesions, but only 42.9% for seven specific diagnoses.
- Logistic regression model: 100% sensitivity, 33.9% specificity, 53.6% accuracy.
- CNN model: 58.2% sensitivity, 90.8% specificity, 59.5% accuracy for melanoma diagnosis, outperforming logistic regression in specificity and overall accuracy.
Conclusions:
- AI models, particularly CNNs, demonstrate potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy for complex dermatological conditions like aPFLs.
- Integrating AI with clinical data and evaluating diverse AI approaches is crucial for developing precise and scalable dermatological applications.
- AI shows a critical role in improving patient management and outcomes in dermatology.
Keywords:
convolutional neural networkdeep learningdermatoscopyiDScorelogistic regressionmachine learningpigmented facial lesionsskin cancer
