Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
Published on: April 19, 2024
Assessing Femoral Head Medialization in Developmental Hip Dysplasia Type 1 and Type 2 Hip Separation
Sonay Aydin1, Onder Durmaz1, Erdem Fatihoglu1
1Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan University, 24100 Erzincan, Turkey.
Insights
Ultrasonography is key for detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The FMD model shows high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating hip types 1 and 2, aiding diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Orthopedic Imaging
- Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)
Background:
- Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) affects 0.1-2 per 1000 infants.
- Hip ultrasonography (US) with Graf categorization is the gold standard for DDH screening.
- Type 1 hips (alpha angle > 60°) and Type 2 hips (50-59°) are key classifications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the Femoral-Medial Distance (FMD) model in differentiating between Type 1 and Type 2 hips.
- To assess the diagnostic performance of the FMD model in a clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 208 hip US scans (110 patients, 98 bilateral) from January to December 2020.
- Analysis focused on differentiating Type 1 and Type 2 hips based on Graf classification.
- Evaluation of the FMD model's sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for predicting Type 1 mature hips.
Main Results:
- 108 US images were classified as Type 1 hips and 100 as Type 2 hips.
- No significant differences in age, gender, or laterality between groups (p > 0.05).
- The FMD model achieved 86% sensitivity and 70% specificity for Type 1 hips (values > 2.9 mm), with an AUC of 0.628.
Conclusions:
- Differentiating Type 1 and Type 2 hips via US can be challenging.
- The FMD model demonstrates high specificity and sensitivity, proving successful in differentiating hip types.
- FMD assessment offers a valuable tool for improving diagnostic accuracy in DDH.
Background/Objectives:
The prevalence of developmental hip dysplasia is estimated to be 0.1-2 per 1000 infants. Hip imaging by ultrasonography is considered to be the gold standard method for screening and detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as per the Graf categorization. The classification of hip differentiation into type 1 and type 2 is determined by the alpha angle, as assessed by the Graf classification. Type 1 hips are defined as those with an alpha angle exceeding 60 degrees, whilst type 2 hips are defined as those with measurements falling within the range of 50 to 59 degrees.
Methods:
The computerized patient card in our institution had a compilation of 208 hip photographs taken from 110 patients, with 98 of them being bilateral. The acquisition of these photos occurred from January 2020 to December 2020. A retrospective review was conducted on the ultrasound (US) scans, with a specific emphasis on the outcomes related to type 1 and type 2 hips.
Results:
There were 108 high-resolution US photos in the type 1 hip group and 100 high-resolution US images in the type 2 hip group. In terms of unilateral or bilateral cases, gender, or age, no statistically significant differences were seen between the two groups (p > 0.05). The FMD model exhibited a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 70% in effectively predicting the presence of type 1 mature hips when the values surpassed 2.9 mm. The AUC (area under the curve) value achieved was 0.628.
Conclusions:
The process of diagnostic categorization may occasionally encounter challenges in accurately differentiating between type 1 and type 2 hip separation subsequent to a hip ultrasound examination. The findings of our analysis indicate that the assessment of the FMD is a highly successful method, demonstrating both high specificity and sensitivity in differentiating between various scenarios.
More Related Videos
07:43In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022