Defining Postinduction Hemodynamic Instability With an Automated Classification Model
Eline Kho1,2, Rogier V Immink1, Bjorn J P van der Ster1
1From the Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background:
Postinduction hypotension (PIH) may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In earlier studies, the definition of PIH is solely based on different absolute or relative thresholds. However, the time-course (eg, how fast blood pressure drops during induction) is rarely incorporated, whereas it might represent the hemodynamic instability of a patient. We propose a comprehensive model to distinguish hemodynamically unstable from stable patients by combining blood pressure thresholds with the magnitude and speed of decline.
Methods:
This prospective study included 375 adult elective noncardiac surgery patients. Noninvasive blood pressure was continuously measured between 5 minutes before up to 15 minutes after the first induction agent had been administered. An expert panel rated whether the patient experienced clinically relevant hemodynamic instability or not. Interrater correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation were computed to check for consistency between experts. Next, an automated classification model for clinically relevant hemodynamic instability was developed using mean, maximum, minimum systolic, mean, diastolic arterial blood pressure (SAP, MAP, and DAP, respectively) and their corresponding time course of decline. The model was trained and tested based on the hemodynamic instability labels provided by the experts.
Results:
In total 78 patients were classified as having experienced hemodynamic instability and 279 as not. The hemodynamically unstable patients were significantly older (7 years, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4-11, P < .001), with a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (3% higher, 95% CI, 1-8, P = .036). Before induction, hemodynamically unstable patients had a higher SAP (median (first-third quartile): 161 (145-175) mm Hg vs 150 (134-166) mm Hg, P < .001) compared to hemodynamic stable patients. Interrater agreement between experts was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). The random forest classifier model showed excellent performance with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.96, a sensitivity of 0.84, and specificity of 0.94.
Conclusions:
Based on the high sensitivity and specificity, the developed model is able to differentiate between clinically relevant hemodynamic instability and hemodynamic stable patients. This classification model will pave the way for future research concerning hemodynamic instability and its prevention.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
One-Degree-of-Freedom System
A one-degree-of-freedom system is defined by an independent variable that determines its state and behavior. One example of a one-degree-of-freedom system is a simple harmonic oscillator, such as a...
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
Multimachine Stability
In analyzing the system, the nodal equations represent the relationship between bus voltages, machine voltages, and machine currents. The nodal equation is given by:
Wind Turbine Machine Models
Induction machines interact through the rotating magnetic field generated by the stator and the rotor. The key parameter is slip, which is the difference between synchronous speed and rotor speed relative to synchronous speed. Slip is...
Typical Model Studies


