Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

European consensus on pre-operative imaging in breast cancer developed jointly by EUSOBI, ESSO, ESP and ESTRO.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Household vulnerability to climate impacts on WASH and risk mitigation in informal settlements of Eastern Uganda.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A comparison of tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers and their relationship with breast density and AJCC prognostic stage in a UK screening cohort.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Impact of using artificial intelligence as a second reader in breast screening including arbitration.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy, fairness and clinical implementation of AI for breast cancer screening: results of multicenter retrospective and prospective technical feasibility studies.

Nature cancer·2026
Same author

Acceptance, experience, and feedback for supplemental screening in dense breasts among women participating in the BRAID trial.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

Extending responsible artificial intelligence to palliative care: the irreversibility problem with algorithmic accountability.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same journal

Deception in clinical large language models: an under-recognised safety risk.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same journal

Large language models and the mental health crisis.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same journal

Equity in virtual urgent care: lessons from health system-based models.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same journal

Predicting the risk of serious muscle disorders in individuals eligible for statin treatment in England: derivation and validation of a clinical prediction model.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same journal

Ensuring the clinical impact of medical artificial intelligence.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K

Strategies for integrating artificial intelligence into mammography screening programmes: a retrospective simulation

Zacharias V Fisches1, Michael Ball1, Trasias Mukama1

  • 1Vara, Berlin, Germany.

The Lancet. Digital Health
|October 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into mammography screening can improve cancer detection and reduce workload. Decision referral strategies show the most promise for enhancing screening program performance and efficiency.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

774
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

774
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Mammography screening programs aim to detect cancer early but face challenges in efficiency and accuracy.
  • Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential to support radiologists and improve screening metrics.
  • The comparative performance of different AI integration strategies in mammography screening is not well-understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the programme-level performance metrics of seven distinct AI integration strategies in mammography screening.
  • To evaluate the impact of AI on cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate, and radiologist workload.
  • To assess the distribution of cancer stages and grades detected by AI and its localization accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective comparative evaluation of seven AI integration strategies was conducted using large-scale mammography datasets from Germany, the UK, and Sweden.
  • A commercially available AI model (Vara version 2.10) was utilized.
  • Simulated performance metrics included cancer detection rate (CDR), recall rate, and workload reduction, compared against existing screening program data.

Main Results:

  • Compared to the German program, standalone AI achieved non-inferior CDR with reduced recall. Single reader replacement improved CDR and reduced workload by 49%.
  • Programme-level decision referral in Germany demonstrated a higher CDR (6.85) with lower recall (3.55) and 84% workload reduction.
  • In the UK, AI strategies improved CDR without increasing recall, achieving significant workload reductions (up to 95%). Swedish data showed a 17.7% CDR increase with programme-level decision referral and 92% workload reduction.

Conclusions:

  • Decision referral strategies for AI integration in mammography screening yielded the most significant improvements in cancer detection rates and reductions in recall rates.
  • All evaluated AI integration strategies, except for normal triaging, demonstrated potential to enhance mammography screening program metrics.
  • AI integration, particularly through decision referral, offers a promising avenue for optimizing mammography screening efficiency and effectiveness.