Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Risk and Benefit for Basket Trials in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Katarzyna Klas1,2, Karolina Strzebonska1, Lucja Zaborowska1,2,3
1Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group (REMEDY), Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Michalowskiego 12, 31-126, Kraków, Poland.
Background:
Oncology research is increasingly adopting new clinical trial models that implement the concept of precision medicine. One of these is the basket clinical trial design. Basket clinical trials allow new treatments to be evaluated across multiple tumor types. Patients recruited to basket clinical trials share certain molecular characteristics of their cancer that are predictive of clinical benefit from the experimental treatment.
Objective:
Our aim was to describe the risks and benefits of basket clinical trials in oncology.
Methods:
Our study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023406401). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov for reports of basket clinical trials in oncology published between 1 January, 2001, and 14 June, 2023. We measured the risk by treatment-related adverse events (grades 3, 4, and 5), and the benefit by objective response rate. We also extracted and analyzed data on progression-free survival and overall survival. When possible, data were meta-analyzed.
Results:
We included 126 arms of 75 basket clinical trials accounting for 7659 patients. The pooled objective response rate was 18.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.8-21.1). The rate of treatment-related death was 0.7% (95% CI 0.4-1.0), while 30.4% (95% CI 24.2-36.7) of patients experienced grade 3/4 drug-related toxicity. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI 2.6-3.9), and the median overall survival was 8.9 months (95% CI 6.7-10.2).
Conclusions:
Our results provide an empirical basis for communicating about the risks and benefits of basket clinical trials and for refining new models of clinical trials applied in precision medicine.
Insights
Basket clinical trials in oncology show an 18% objective response rate. While risks include 30.4% grade 3/4 toxicity, these trials are vital for precision medicine advancements.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Precision medicine is transforming oncology research with novel clinical trial designs.
- Basket clinical trials evaluate treatments across multiple tumor types based on molecular characteristics.
- These trials aim to identify patients likely to benefit from specific experimental therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the risks and benefits associated with basket clinical trials in oncology.
- To provide an evidence-based understanding of treatment-related adverse events and efficacy outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Data from basket clinical trials published between 2001 and 2023 were analyzed.
- Key metrics included objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related adverse events (grades 3-5).
Main Results:
- The study analyzed 75 basket trials involving 7659 patients.
- The pooled objective response rate was 18.0%, with a treatment-related death rate of 0.7%.
- Grade 3/4 drug-related toxicity affected 30.4% of patients; median progression-free survival was 3.1 months and overall survival was 8.9 months.
Conclusions:
- Basket clinical trials offer a valuable framework for precision medicine in oncology.
- Results provide an empirical foundation for risk-benefit communication in these novel trial designs.
- Findings can inform the refinement of future clinical trial models for targeted therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

