Identification of Essential Features in Developing a Novel Femoral Stem Reflecting Anatomical Features of East Asian...

Background: Recent advancements in hip arthroplasty aim to enhance the stability, longevity, and functionality of femoral implants. However, the distal fitting of femoral stems, often caused by metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch, remains a significant issue, particularly in patients with Dorr type A femora. Such mismatches can result in suboptimal implant performance, leading to potential complications. This study focuses on evaluating the anatomical compatibility of five representative single-tapered wedge mid-short stems with the mediolateral (ML) anatomy of the proximal femur in an East Asian population, where these mismatches are often more pronounced. Methods: A total of 742 patients from two hospitals, all of whom underwent unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty, were included in the study. The contralateral proximal femur was confirmed to have normal anatomy in each patient. Hip anteroposterior radiographs were used for measurements, which were standardized in conjunction with CT images. Key anatomical parameters were measured, including proximal and distal medial-lateral canal dimensions, vertical offset, and medial offset. Five femoral stem designs-Tri-lock^®, Taperloc^®, Anthology^®, Accolade II^®, and Fit^®-were evaluated. R programming was employed for a detailed fit analysis to match stem sizes with patient anatomy, categorizing the fit as proximal, simultaneous proximal-distal, or distal engagement. Results: Among the femoral stems analyzed, the Fit^® stem demonstrated the closest alignment with the regression line for ML widths in the study population (slope = 0.69; population ML slope = 0.38). This was followed by Accolade II^®, which had a slope of 0.83. In terms of offset options, the Accolade II^® offered the largest offset coverage, making it particularly suitable for this population. The fit analysis revealed that the Fit^® stem had the highest suitable fit rate (90.56%), followed by Accolade II^® (73.04%). Taperloc^®, Anthology^®, and Tri-lock^® had similar fit rates of approximately 59%. Overall, optimal results were obtained for 92.05% of the population in the automated fitting trial, regardless of the product type. Conclusions: When designing modern cementless femoral stems intended for press-fit fixation, it is crucial to account for the anatomical variations specific to the target population. In this study, Fit^® and Accolade II^® femoral components demonstrated superior compatibility with the femoral anatomy of the East Asian population, particularly in those with a higher incidence of Dorr type A femora. These stems, characterized by slimmer distal dimensions and high-offset options, appear to minimize metaphyseal-diaphyseal mismatch and associated complications.