Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
Optimized Machine Learning Model for Predicting Compressive Strength of Alkali-Activated Concrete Through
Guo-Hua Fang1, Zhong-Ming Lin1, Cheng-Zhi Xie2
1CCC-FHDI Engineering Corp., Ltd., Guangzhou 510290, China.
Machine learning accurately predicts alkali-activated concrete (AAC) strength using industrial by-products. Optimized XGBoost models achieved high accuracy, offering a reliable alternative to traditional concrete for reduced carbon emissions.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science and Engineering
- Sustainable Construction Materials
- Computational Materials Science
Background:
- Alkali-activated concrete (AAC) utilizes industrial by-products (fly ash, slag) as sustainable alternatives to Portland cement, significantly reducing carbon emissions.
- Predicting AAC compressive strength is challenging due to formulation variability, hindering widespread adoption.
- Accurate strength prediction is crucial for reliable performance and material optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust machine learning (ML) model for accurately predicting the compressive strength of alkali-activated concrete (AAC).
- To identify optimal input variable schemes and machine learning algorithms for AAC strength prediction.
- To enhance model interpretability and provide insights into AAC formulation-strength relationships.
Main Methods:
- Curated an extensive dataset of 1756 unique AAC mixtures.
- Evaluated four input variable schemes and compared ML algorithms: Random Forest, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting Regression Trees, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).
- Optimized the best-performing XGBoost model using Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Beetle Antennae Search (BAS), and Bayesian Optimization (BO).
- Applied SHapely Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretability.
Main Results:
- The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance over other ML algorithms.
- Optimized XGBoost achieved a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.99 on the training set and 0.94 on the entire dataset.
- SHAP analysis provided insights into the influence of various input parameters on AAC compressive strength.
Conclusions:
- A synergistic approach combining careful input selection, hyperparameter optimization, and model interpretability significantly enhances AAC strength prediction accuracy.
- The optimized ML model offers a robust and scalable solution for predicting AAC performance.
- This study validates the potential of ML in advancing sustainable construction materials like alkali-activated concrete.
Related Concept Videos
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength

