Ultrasonic Weld Quality Inspection Involving Strength Prediction and Defect Detection in Data-Constrained Training...

Welding is an extensively used technique in manufacturing, and as for every other process, there is the potential for defects in the weld joint that could be catastrophic to the manufactured products. Different welding processes use different parameter settings, which greatly impact the quality of the final welded products. The focus of research in weld defect detection is to develop a non-destructive testing method for weld quality assessment based on observing the weld with an RGB camera. Deep learning techniques have been widely used in the domain of weld defect detection in recent times, but the majority of them use, for example, X-ray images. An RGB image-based solution is attractive, as RGB cameras are comparatively inexpensive compared to X-ray image solutions. However, the number of publicly available RGB image datasets for weld defect detection is comparatively lower than that of X-ray image datasets. This work achieves a complete weld quality assessment involving lap shear strength prediction and visual weld defect detection from an extremely limited dataset. First, a multimodal dataset is generated by the fusion of image data features extracted using a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) designed in this experiment and input parameter settings data. The fusion of the dataset reduced lap shear strength (LSS) prediction errors by 34% compared to prediction errors using only input parameter settings data. This is a promising result, considering the extremely small dataset size. This work also achieves visual weld defect detection on the same limited dataset with the help of an ultrasonic weld defect dataset generated using offline and online data augmentation. The weld defect detection achieves an accuracy of 74%, again a promising result that meets standard requirements. The combination of lap shear strength prediction and visual defect detection leads to a complete inspection to avoid premature failure of the ultrasonic weld joints. The weld defect detection was compared against the publicly available image dataset for surface defect detection.