Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Leveraging real-world data to conduct externally controlled trial for rare diseases with count-type endpoints:
Tianyu Sun1, Eileen Liao1, Nan Shao1
1Biometrics, Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
Conducting randomized controlled trials for medications targeting rare diseases presents significant challenges, due to the scarcity of participants and ethical considerations. Under such circumstances, leveraging real-world data (RWD) to generate supporting evidence may be accepted by the regulatory agency. Constructing an external control arm (ECA) from RWD for a single-arm trial has been conducted occasionally. A complication in this design is that patients from RWD may be eligible at multiple time points. Most studies approach this by selecting one time point as the index date for ECA patients. Here, we propose a novel design for externally controlled trials that permits the inclusion of ECA patients at various entry points. Accompanying this design, we make recommendations for statistical methods to account for measured confounders, limited sample size, within-subject correlation, and potential overdispersion inherent in count data. Furthermore, we present an idea for the blinding process for this type of study. We have conducted a series of simulations to assess the performance of the design and statistical methods in terms of bias, type I error, and efficiency, as compared to the approach of selecting only one entry per ECA patient. The study and parameter setup were based on a hypothetical case inspired by a rare disease study. The results indicate that allowing multiple entries for ECA patients can lead to enhanced performance in many aspects. It provides a controlled type I error, robustness against certain model misspecifications, and a moderate power improvement compared with selecting a single entry per ECA patient.
Insights
This study introduces a new design for clinical trials using real-world data (RWD) for rare diseases. Allowing multiple patient entries from RWD in external control arms improves trial efficiency and reliability.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Real-World Data Analysis
- Rare Disease Research
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials for rare diseases face challenges due to small patient populations and ethical concerns.
- Real-world data (RWD) offers a viable alternative for generating supporting evidence when traditional trials are infeasible.
- External control arms (ECAs) constructed from RWD are occasionally used for single-arm trials, but patient eligibility at multiple time points complicates their design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel externally controlled trial design that accommodates multiple entry points for patients from RWD.
- To recommend statistical methods for handling confounders, small sample sizes, within-subject correlation, and count data overdispersion.
- To present a blinding process suitable for this novel trial design.
Main Methods:
- Development of a new externally controlled trial design allowing multiple entries per patient from RWD.
- Formulation of statistical methods addressing measured confounders, limited sample size, within-subject correlation, and overdispersion.
- Simulation studies based on a rare disease case to evaluate design and method performance against single-entry approaches.
Main Results:
- The proposed design with multiple RWD entries demonstrated controlled type I error rates.
- The methods showed robustness against certain model misspecifications.
- A moderate improvement in statistical power was observed compared to selecting a single entry point per ECA patient.
Conclusions:
- The novel externally controlled trial design with multiple RWD entries enhances trial performance.
- This approach provides a reliable and efficient method for rare disease drug development.
- The proposed statistical methods and blinding process support the implementation of this design.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Censoring Survival Data

