The Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Lymphovascular Invasion Using CT Volume Perfusion

The best treatment option for patients with resectable gastric cancer is radical gastric cancer surgery. However, the postoperative overall survival rate is low. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a risk factor for cancer recurrence and a stand-alone predictor of a poor post-operative prognosis for gastric cancer (GC) patients. Current evaluation of tumor LVI performed on histological specimens, which can only be assessed after surgery, is also limited by intra-tumoural heterogeneity via biopsy. This study explored the value of CT volume perfusion in assessing tumors' lymphovascular invasion of gastric cancer.

59 gastric cancer patients confirmed by pathology who underwent both computed tomography (CT) volume perfusion examinations and gastrectomy surgery were prospectively included. Tumour lymphovascular invasion (LVI, positive or negative) was evaluated. The relationship between clinicopathological variables associated with LVI and CT perfusion parameters was analyzed by univariate analysis, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

The LVI-positive and LVI-negative groups differed significantly in terms of time to start (TTS), mean transit time (MTT), Tmax, and flow extraction product (FEP). Both FEP (odds ratio (OR), 1.048; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.092) and MTT (OR, 0.549; 95% CI: 0.351-0.858) have the potential to be employed as independent predictors of LVI (both p < 0.05). There were different correlations between LVI, lower MTT and greater FEP. The specificity of MTT (87.88%) was higher than that of FEP (72.73%), while the sensitivity of MTT (53.85%) was lower than that of FEP (57.69%). Compared to MTT and FEP alone, the combination demonstrated a comparatively higher area under the curve (AUC) (0.797) and sensitivity (84.62%).

CT volume perfusion helps evaluate LVI in gastric cancer before surgery. MTT and FEP are independent predictors for LVI, and the combination variation has better diagnostic performance. Clinical Trial Register: Jiangmen Central Hospital, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=24375, ChiCTR1800014455.