Peer counseling for perinatal depression in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

Perinatal depression is associated with adverse maternal, newborn and child health outcomes. Treatment gaps and sociocultural factors contribute to its disproportionate burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Task-sharing approaches, such as peer counseling, have been developed to improve access to mental health services. We conducted a scoping review to map the current literature on peer counseling for perinatal women experiencing depression in LMICs. We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Global Health and EMBASE for literature with no date limits. We included 73 records in our analysis, with most being systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and qualitative studies. Most studies were conducted in India and Pakistan and published from 2020 onward. The Thinking Healthy Program (THP) and its Peer-Delivered (THPP) adaptation were the most common interventions. Studies suggested effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability and transferability of peer counseling, particularly within the THPP, for perinatal depression. Studies indicated that local women, as peers and lay counselors, are preferred and effective implementation agents. Gaps in the evidence include those relating to understanding perinatal depression (e.g., contextual understandings of the etiology, comorbidity and heterogeneity and social conditions of psychosocial distress including long-term impacts on relationships and children's development) and understanding and improving implementation. Further research on the adaptation, scaling up and integration of peer-delivered approaches with other approaches to improve impact are needed. There are also gaps in understanding the perspectives and experiences of peer counselors. Evidence gaps may stem from an emphasis on conventional public health approaches and measures derived from Western psychiatry, such as randomized controlled trials. There is relatively little research or implementation that prioritizes peer counselors in terms of understanding their perspectives and experiences (e.g., of professionalization), despite them being central to peer-delivered models. Task sharing has the potential to both empower peer counselors through mental health benefits and professional opportunities but also render peer counselors susceptible to vicarious exposure to traumatic stories and difficult situations amid limitations in available support. Better understanding counselors' and perinatal women's experiences can help decolonize the evidence base and improve implementation.