Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026
Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
Whole-exome profiles of inflammatory breast cancer and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
François Bertucci1,2, Arnaud Guille3, Florence Lerebours4
1Predictive Oncology Laboratory, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, 232, Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. bertuccif@ipc.unicancer.fr.
Background:
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) became a standard treatment strategy for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) because of high disease aggressiveness. However, given the heterogeneity of IBC, no molecular feature reliably predicts the response to chemotherapy. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) of clinical tumor samples provides an opportunity to identify genomic alterations associated with chemosensitivity.
Methods:
We retrospectively applied WES to 44 untreated IBC primary tumor samples and matched normal DNA. The pathological response to NACT, assessed on operative specimen, distinguished the patients with versus without pathological complete response (pCR versus no-pCR respectively). We compared the mutational profiles, spectra and signatures, pathway mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs), HRD, and heterogeneity scores between pCR versus no-pCR patients.
Results:
The TMB, HRD, and mutational spectra were not different between the complete (N = 13) versus non-complete (N = 31) responders. The two most frequently mutated genes were TP53 and PIK3CA. They were more frequently mutated in the complete responders, but the difference was not significant. Only two genes, NLRP3 and SLC9B1, were significantly more frequently mutated in the complete responders (23% vs. 0%). By contrast, several biological pathways involved in protein translation, PI3K pathway, and signal transduction showed significantly higher mutation frequency in the patients with pCR. We observed a higher abundance of COSMIC signature 7 (due to ultraviolet light exposure) in tumors from complete responders. The comparison of CNAs of the 3808 genes included in the GISTIC regions between both patients' groups identified 234 genes as differentially altered. The CIN signatures were not differentially represented between the complete versus non-complete responders. Based on the H-index, the patients with heterogeneous tumors displayed a lower pCR rate (11%) than those with less heterogeneous tumors (35%).
Conclusions:
This is the first study aiming at identifying correlations between the WES data of IBC samples and the achievement of pCR to NACT. Our results, obtained in this 44-sample series, suggest a few subtle genomic alterations associated with pathological response. Additional investigations are required in larger series.
