Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

329
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
329
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

121
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
121
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

91
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
91
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

10.4K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
10.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Screening for Missed Opportunities for Diagnosis in the ED Using eTriggers and Large Language Models.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Priorities for improving paediatric diagnosis: findings from a modified Delphi study.

BMJ quality & safety·2026
Same author

Using generative AI to support clinical reasoning coaching: a theory-informed approach.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

Gelatin-based cryogels seeded with exosomes enhance osteogenic activity and bone regeneration in a rabbit femoral defect model.

Journal of biomaterials applications·2026
Same author

Large reasoning models as thinking machines for medicine.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Employee preferences in health plan design: results from a national survey.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

Notice of Retraction. Ren Y, et al. Personality Traits and Social Isolation in Older Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(5):e269569.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Error in Grant Number in Funding/Support Section.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

The Supplementary Role of Friends in Caregiving Networks.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Urbanicity, Neighborhood Conditions, and Dementia Mortality.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Equity and Cancer Survival Among Veterans Health Administration Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Limbic System Microstructure in Neonates With Antenatal Opioid Exposure.

JAMA network open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

506

Large Language Model Influence on Diagnostic Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ethan Goh1,2, Robert Gallo3, Jason Hom4

  • 1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

JAMA Network Open
|October 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Large language models (LLMs) did not significantly improve physician diagnostic reasoning in a clinical trial. However, the LLM alone outperformed physicians, suggesting potential for future AI-physician collaboration.

More Related Videos

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

506
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.1K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Artificial Intelligence
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • Physician Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Large language models (LLMs) show promise in medical reasoning assessments.
  • The impact of LLMs on actual physician diagnostic reasoning remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of large language models (LLMs) on physician diagnostic reasoning compared to traditional resources.

Main Methods:

  • A single-blind randomized clinical trial involved 50 physicians across multiple institutions.
  • Participants were randomized to use LLMs with conventional resources or conventional resources alone.
  • Diagnostic performance was assessed using a standardized rubric and expert consensus.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in diagnostic reasoning scores was found between the LLM group and the conventional resources group (76% vs. 74%).
  • Time spent per case did not differ significantly between groups.
  • The LLM, when used alone, scored significantly higher (16 percentage points) than the conventional resources group.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating LLMs as diagnostic aids did not enhance physician clinical reasoning in this study.
  • LLMs alone demonstrated superior performance, highlighting the need for further development in AI-physician collaboration.
  • Future research should focus on optimizing the synergy between artificial intelligence and clinical practice.