Risks of Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: Data From Two International Registries on Rectal Cancer.
Laura M Fernandez1, Guilherme P São Julião2,3, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz4
1Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Summary
Patients who experience local regrowth (LR) after rectal cancer treatment have a higher risk of distant metastases (DM) compared to those undergoing total mesorectal excision (TME). This suggests that delaying surgery after initial response may worsen oncologic outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal cancer management
- Oncology
- Surgical oncology
Background:
- Organ preservation via Watch and Wait (WW) is an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy.
- Local regrowth (LR) occurs in nearly 30% of these patients, potentially increasing the risk of distant metastases (DM) even with salvage resection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the risk of distant metastases (DM) in patients with local regrowth (LR) after Watch and Wait (WW) versus patients with near-complete pathologic response (nPCR) managed by total mesorectal excision (TME).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective comparison of patients from the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD) with LR after WW and patients from the VIKINGO project with nPCR after TME.
- Primary endpoint: 3-year distant metastasis-free survival.
- Secondary endpoint: identification of risk factors for DM.
Main Results:
- Distant metastasis (DM) rates were significantly higher in the LR group (22.8%) compared to the nPCR group (10.2%).
- Independent risk factors for DM included LR, ypT3-4, and ypN+ status.
- 3-year DM-free survival was significantly worse for patients with LR (75%) versus nPCR (87%).
Conclusions:
- Patients with local regrowth (LR) after Watch and Wait (WW) demonstrate a higher risk of subsequent distant metastases (DM) compared to those managed with total mesorectal excision (TME) for near-complete pathologic response.
- Leaving the primary tumor in situ until LR develops may lead to poorer oncologic outcomes.


