Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

93
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
93
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

526
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
526
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

654
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
654
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

59
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
59

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing Understanding and Acceptance of Equipment Localization: Mixed Methods Study With Clinic Staff and Potential Patients.

JMIR human factors·2026
Same author

Disambiguating Tolerance of Ambiguity: Introducing the MAAS-9 as a Short, Reliable, and Multidimensional Measure of Attitudes Toward Ambiguity.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Power and Sexuality: Associations of Experienced and Desired Power with Sexual Aspects of Couples' Lives.

Journal of sex research·2026
Same author

Modelling of analyte profiles and band broadening generated by interface loops used in two-dimensional liquid chromatography operated in the First-In-First-Out mode.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

Low Power and High Psychopathy: A Toxic Combination for Psychological Aggression.

Aggressive behavior·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Background uncertainty does not increase risk aversion in decision making.

Johannes Leder1, Philipp Chapkovski2, Astrid Schütz1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bamberg, 96045, Bamberg, Germany.

Scientific Reports
|October 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated how background uncertainty affects risk-taking behavior. Despite theoretical predictions, four experiments with 863 participants found no significant impact of background uncertainty on decision-making.

Keywords:
AmbiguityBackground uncertaintyDecision makingRiskRisk-taking behaviorUncertainty

More Related Videos

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.0K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.0K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Economic and psychological theories suggest background uncertainty, independent of a decision, can influence risk-taking.
  • Prior empirical evidence is inconclusive, often based on limited experimental designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate the effect of background uncertainty on decision-making.
  • To differentiate and test the impact of background ambiguity (unknown probabilities) versus background risk (known probabilities).
  • To test if the type of background uncertainty moderates its effect on risk-taking.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review to distinguish background ambiguity and background risk.
  • Four controlled experiments involving 863 participants.
  • Induction of background uncertainty (ambiguity or risk) using varied methods.
  • Measurement of risk-taking behavior using multiple validated tasks.

Main Results:

  • No significant effect of background uncertainty (either ambiguity or risk) on participants' risk-taking behavior was observed.
  • The type of background uncertainty did not significantly moderate the effect on risk-taking.

Conclusions:

  • The study's findings do not support the hypothesis that background uncertainty influences risk-taking behavior in decision-making.
  • Further research may be needed to explore potential moderators or alternative theoretical frameworks.