Spiny mice are primed but fail to regenerate volumetric skeletal muscle loss injuries

Mackenzie L Davenport1,2,3,4, Amaya Fong5,6,7, Kaela N Albury5,6,7

  • 1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. davenport.m@ufl.edu.

Skeletal Muscle
|October 29, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

African spiny mice (Acomys) show remarkable regeneration but fail to regenerate skeletal muscle after volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury. Despite being primed for repair, Acomys did not recover muscle mass or function better than control mice.

Area of Science:

  • Regenerative medicine
  • Mammalian skeletal muscle biology
  • Comparative physiology

Background:

  • African spiny mouse (Acomys) exhibits exceptional regenerative capabilities for various injuries, including skin, kidney, and spinal cord.
  • Acomys displays superior skeletal muscle regeneration compared to standard mice, particularly after cardiotoxin injury and volumetric muscle loss (VML) of the panniculus carnosus.
  • VML injury, characterized by significant muscle mass loss, presents therapeutic challenges due to persistent inflammation and loss of regenerative cues. The panniculus carnosus in Acomys, while regenerative, is not a true skeletal muscle relevant to human VML models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the regenerative potential of Acomys in a skeletal muscle VML injury model relevant to human physiology.
  • To compare the skeletal muscle regenerative response of Acomys to that of a standard laboratory mouse (Mus C57BL6/J) following VML injury.

Main Methods:

  • Two distinct VML injuries were induced in the tibialis anterior muscle of Acomys.
  • The regenerative outcomes in Acomys were compared with those in Mus C57BL6/J mice over a three-month period.
  • Muscle mass, myofiber number, force production, and expression of embryonic myosin heavy chain (eMHC) were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Neither Acomys nor Mus recovered lost muscle mass or myofiber number within three months post-VML injury.
  • Acomys did not exhibit superior force production recovery compared to Mus following VML injury.
  • Acomys maintained eMHC expression at three months, indicating a primed but ultimately failed regenerative state, while Mus ceased eMHC expression earlier.

Conclusions:

  • The remarkable regenerative capacity of Acomys does not extend to skeletal muscle regeneration following VML injury.
  • Despite evidence of a primed regenerative state (eMHC expression), Acomys failed to achieve functional recovery in skeletal muscle VML.
  • These findings suggest that the mechanisms underlying Acomys's exceptional regeneration in other tissues may not directly apply to skeletal muscle VML repair.

Related Concept Videos