Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Integration of ubiquitination-related genes in predictive signatures for prognosis and immunotherapy response in
Haotian Qin1,2,3, Tiantian Qi1,2,3, Juan Xu4
1Department of Bone & Joint Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Background:
Ubiquitination is one of the most prevalent and complex post-translational modifications of proteins in eukaryotes, playing a critical role in regulating various physiological and pathological processes. Targeting ubiquitination pathways, either through inhibition or activation, holds promise as a novel therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. However, the expression patterns, prognostic significance, and underlying mechanisms of ubiquitination-related genes (URGs) in sarcoma (SARC) remain unclear.
Methods:
We analyzed URG expression patterns and prognostic implications in TCGA-SARC using public databases, identifying DEGs related to ubiquitination among SARC molecular subtypes. Functional enrichment analysis elucidated their biological significance. Prognostic signatures were developed using LASSO-Cox regression, and a predictive nomogram was constructed. External validation was performed using GEO datasets and clinical tissue samples. The association between URG risk scores and various clinical parameters, immune response, drug sensitivity, and RNA modification regulators was investigated. Integration of data from multiple sources and RT-qPCR confirmed upregulated expression of prognostic URGs in SARC. Single-cell RNA sequencing data analyzed URG distribution across immune cell types. Prediction analysis identified potential target genes of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs.
Results:
We identified five valuable genes (CALR, CASP3, BCL10, PSMD7, PSMD10) and constructed a prognostic model, simultaneously identifying two URG-related subtypes in SARC. The UEGs between subtypes in SARC are mainly enriched in pathways such as Cell cycle, focal adhesion, and ECM-receptor interaction. Analysis of URG risk scores reveals that patients with a low-risk score have better prognoses compared to those with high-risk scores. There is a significant correlation between DRG riskscore and clinical features, immune therapy response, drug sensitivity, and genes related to pan-RNA epigenetic modifications. High-risk SARC patients were identified as potential beneficiaries of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We established regulatory axes in SARC, including CALR/hsa-miR-29c-3p/LINC00943, CASP3/hsa-miR-143-3p/LINC00944, and MIR503HG. RT-qPCR data further confirmed the upregulation of prognostic URGs in SARC. Finally, we validated the prognostic model's excellent predictive performance in predicting outcomes for SARC patients.
Conclusion:
We discovered a significant correlation between aberrant expression of URGs and prognosis in SARC patients, identifying a prognostic model related to ubiquitination. This model provides a basis for individualized treatment and immunotherapy decisions for SARC patients.
