Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

09:11
Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
389
Holmium-166 radioembolisation dosimetry in HCC
Margot T M Reinders1, Arthur J A T Braat1, Karel J van Erpecum2
1Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University - University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 100, 3500 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
|October 29, 2024
Summary
Holmium-166 radioembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma shows higher absorbed doses correlate with better tumor response. Non-tumor absorbed dose is linked to toxicity, guiding personalized treatment with 166Ho-microspheres.
Area of Science:
- Hepatobiliary Cancers
- Interventional Radiology
- Nuclear Medicine
Background:
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver cancer with limited treatment options.
- Radioembolisation using holmium-166 (166Ho) microspheres offers a targeted radiation therapy approach.
- Optimizing dosimetry is crucial for maximizing treatment efficacy and minimizing toxicity in HCC radioembolisation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the dosimetry, dose-response, and dose-toxicity relationships of 166Ho radioembolisation in HCC patients.
- To establish preliminary absorbed dose thresholds for predicting tumor response.
- To assess the association between non-tumor absorbed dose and treatment-related adverse events.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-one HCC patients underwent 166Ho-microspheres radioembolisation as part of the HEPAR Primary study.
- Linear mixed models analyzed the association between tumor absorbed dose and treatment response (mRECIST).
- Linear regression models examined the relationship between non-tumor absorbed dose and toxicity (CTCAE v4.03).
Main Results:
- Median tumor absorbed dose was 95.5 Gy; median non-tumor absorbed doses were 19 Gy (whole liver) and 30 Gy (target liver).
- A significant association was found between non-tumor absorbed dose and toxicity.
- Tumors achieving partial or complete response received 41% higher absorbed doses than non-responders (p=0.04).
- Tumor absorbed dose thresholds for 90% and 100% response prediction were 155 Gy and 184.5 Gy, respectively.
Conclusions:
- A positive correlation exists between tumor absorbed dose and treatment response in HCC patients.
- Higher non-tumor absorbed doses are associated with increased toxicity.
- Established dose thresholds can guide personalized dosimetry for 166Ho-microspheres radioembolisation in HCC.

