Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Absorption of Nasal and Bronchial Fluids: Precision Sampling of the Human Respiratory Mucosa and Laboratory Processing of Samples
Published on: January 21, 2018
Difference between real world practice and clinical research: A comparison of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal
Tongyan Zhang1, Yajun Du2, Yanyan Ren1
1Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China; Infectious Diseases Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Abstract:
Oropharyngeal (OP) sampling is one of the most commonly used methods for respiratory sampling, but its positivity rate in real practice compared with that of nasopharyngeal (NP) sampling is not fully known. The differences between OP and NP in practice and between practice and the literature were compared. In total, 2323 positive results from 6708 patients were recorded in the laboratory test system, and 15,021 positive results from 31,333 patients were recorded in the national report. The positivity rate changed from 2.3 % to 38.11 % after the sampling method was changed from OP to NP in the same setting. The difference between OP and NP (calculated as (NP-OP)/NP) varies from -7.73-28.57 % in the literature and from 61.35-94.59 % in practice. Real-world practice is complicated and thus different from strictly quality-controlled studies.
Related Concept Videos
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required

