Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Screening for insulin resistance in children with abdominal obesity: sex-specific performance of TyG index, FGIR, and VAI.

Physical activity and nutrition·2026
Same author

Lower-neck involvement and post-concurrent chemoradiotherapy response predict distant metastasis in head and neck cancer.

Radiation oncology journal·2026
Same author

Generation of Functional Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells Through Serial Replating of iPSC-Derived NPC Spheres.

Cells·2026
Same author

Habitual Ultra-processed Food Intake Is Associated with Gut Dysbiosis and Pro-inflammatory Metabolite Profiles in Korean Patients with IBD.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same author

Population Pharmacokinetics and Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Lenalidomide Incorporating Total and Unbound Plasma Concentrations in Renally Impaired Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Drug design, development and therapy·2026
Same author

Advancing Small-Molecule Immunotherapy Through Polymeric Micelle Delivery.

Pharmaceutics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Correlation between implant angulation and crestal bone changes: A 5-year retrospective study.

Donghyun Kim1, Kihyun Kim2, Joo-Young Ohe3

  • 1Graduate student, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|October 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Nonaxial implant positioning leads to greater peri-implant bone loss compared to axial positioning. Careful consideration of implant angulation and antagonist type is crucial for minimizing bone loss around dental implants.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.0K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.0K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Previous research on nonaxial forces and peri-implant bone loss primarily focused on mesiodistal angulations.
  • Multidirectional implant angulations, including buccolingual aspects, may influence peri-implant bone loss differently than mesiodistal measurements alone.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the correlation between multidirectional implant angulations and peri-implant crestal bone loss.
  • To determine if multidirectional angulations provide a more accurate assessment of bone loss risk.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 506 dental implants in 288 patients over a mean follow-up of 5.1 years.
  • Utilized periapical radiographs and CAD files to assess implant angulation (mesiodistal and buccolingual) and peri-implant bone loss.
  • Excluded patients with uncontrolled systemic disease; analyzed variables including implant location, antagonist type, and attrition status.

Main Results:

  • Nonaxial implants showed significantly greater mean peri-implant bone loss (0.22 ±0.48 mm) compared to axial implants (0.10 ±0.39 mm).
  • Increased bone loss was observed with implant-supported prostheses as antagonists and in mandibular locations.
  • The correlation between multidirectional implant angulation and bone loss was statistically significant (P<.05).

Conclusions:

  • A significant correlation exists between multidirectional implant angulation and peri-implant bone loss.
  • Nonaxially positioned implants are associated with increased bone loss, influenced by implant location and antagonist type.
  • Optimizing implant angulation and considering antagonist factors are vital for mitigating peri-implant bone loss.