Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Coronary Physiological Indexes to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve
Lennert Minten1, Keir McCutcheon2, Maarten Vanhaverbeke3
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Belgium.
Insights
In patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, new cutoff values for fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) can accurately predict myocardial ischemia. Aortic valve replacement improves microvascular function and reduces left ventricular mass.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Evaluating myocardial ischemia in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is complex due to potential microvascular dysfunction (MVD).
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) lack validation in this specific clinical scenario.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define the relationship between hyperemic and resting indices in AS patients with CAD.
- To assess the impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on epicardial and microvascular function.
- To establish accurate FFR/RFR cutoff points for diagnosing ischemia in AS.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter study involving serial FFR and RFR measurements.
- Evaluation of MVD using coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance indices.
- Measurements taken before and 6 months after AVR in patients with severe AS and intermediate to severe CAD.
Main Results:
- Significant FFR/RFR discordance observed before AVR.
- Acutely post-AVR, FFR decreased while RFR remained stable; long-term, FFR decreased and RFR increased significantly.
- Left ventricular mass decreased, and microvascular function improved post-AVR.
- FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ischemia.
Conclusions:
- FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 are accurate predictors of myocardial ischemia in severe AS and CAD.
- AVR leads to significant changes in FFR and RFR, reduced left ventricular mass, and improved microvascular function.
Background:
The evaluation of myocardial ischemia in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and possible microvascular dysfunction (MVD) is challenging because fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) have not been validated in this clinical setting.
Objectives:
The aims of this study in patients with AS and CAD were: 1) to describe the relationship between hyperemic and resting indexes; 2) to investigate the acute and long-term effects of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on epicardial indexes and microvascular function; 3) to assess the impact of these changes on clinical decision making; and 4) to determine FFR/RFR ischemia cutoff points in AS.
Methods:
In this prospective multicentric study, we performed serial measurements of FFR and RFR and evaluated MVD by means of coronary flow reserve, the index of microvascular resistance, and microvascular resistance reserve in patients with severe AS and intermediate to severe CAD before and 6 months after AVR. Patients underwent myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography before AVR.
Results:
In total, 146 coronary lesions in 116 patients were included. Before AVR, we observed high FFR/RFR discordance according to standard cutoff values (FFR negative [>0.80]/RFR positive [≤0.89] in 42.3% [68/137] of these lesions). Acutely after AVR, FFR decreased significantly (-0.0120 ± 0.0192; P = 0.0045), whereas RFR remained stable (0.0140 ± 0.0673; P = 0.3089). Six months after AVR, FFR decreased (-0.0279 ± 0.0368), whereas RFR increased significantly (+0.0410 ± 0.0487) (P < 0.0001 for both), resulting in 21.5% (21/98) and 39.8% (39/98) of lesions crossing traditional FFR and RFR cutoff lines, respectively. Left ventricular mass decreased significantly (153.68 ± 44.22 g before vs 134.66 ± 37.26 g after; P < 0.0001). MVD was frequently observed at baseline (32.1% abnormal index of microvascular resistance and 68.6% abnormal microvascular resistance reserve) with all microvascular parameters improving after AVR. The most accurate cutoffs to predict ischemia were FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 with comparable accuracy (75%-80%).
Conclusions:
In patients with severe AS and CAD, FFR ≤0.83 and RFR ≤0.85 appear to predict myocardial ischemia more accurately. Six months after AVR, FFR decreases, whereas RFR increases significantly with a simultaneous decrease of left ventricular mass and an improvement of microvascular function.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Surgical Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

