Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
Simultaneous comparison of three methods for bone quality assessment
Xingxiao Pu1,2, Chengkui Geng1,3, Weiping Xiao1
1Department of Orthopedics, Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, P.R. China.
Purpose:
The study aims to investigate the correlations between the T score, Hounsfield units (HU) value, and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, and to compare their discrimination capability for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).
Methods:
One hundred and sixty-three eligible participants were enrolled (49 OVCF group,114 non-OVCF group). The T score, HU value, and VBQ score were collected retrospectively. Then, those three parameters were compared between the OVCF and non-OVCF groups and the correlations among the three were assessed. Finally, the discrimination capability of those parameters was compared by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results:
The OVCF group showed a lower T score, lower HU value, and higher VBQ score (all P < 0.001) than the non-OVCF group. Correlations were observed among the T score, HU value, and VBQ score (all P < 0.001, HU VS. mean T score, r = 0.66; HU VS. minimum T score, r = 0.67; VBQ VS. mean/ minimum T score, r=-0.33; VBQ VS. HU, r=-0.45). The HU value indicated the maximum area under curve (AUC), followed by the VBQ score and then the T score. Moreover, the AUC of combining the VBQ score and the HU value was similar to that of the HU value.
Conclusions:
Both the HU value and the VBQ score had superior discrimination capability for patients with OVCF compared to the T score, especially for the HU value. For patients with routinely performed lumbar MRI or CT scans, the HU value or the VBQ score may provide alternative options for assessing the bone condition.
