Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.5K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

5.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
5.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

2.5K
2.5K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

62
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
62
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Complementation Tests00:49

Complementation Tests

4.9K
A complementation test is a simple cross to identify whether the two mutations are located on the same gene or different genes. It was first performed by Edward Lewis in the 1940s while working on fruit flies. He developed the test to identify the location and arrangement of different mutations on chromosomes.
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Epidemiological characteristics of amebiasis in Japan from 2001 to 2022.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal associations of academic stress with eating related patterns, nutrition, somatic indicators, and depressive symptoms in university students: A study protocol.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Pollution removal efficiency enhancement by agricultural biomass additions in constructed wetlands: A framework integrating meta-analysis with explainable machine learning.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Insulation failure mapping on power transformer bushing using FRA and electrostatic simulation.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Enhancing medical Q&A systems with multimodal knowledge graphs and dual-layer attention mechanisms.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

UAMP: Consistent video object segmentation with uncertainty-aware memory propagation.

PloS one·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.6K

Evaluating LLMs' grammatical error correction performance in learner Chinese.

Sha Lin1

  • 1Yantai Institute of Technology, Yantai, China.

Plos One
|October 30, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in Chinese grammatical error correction (CGEC), but overcorrection and reasoning gaps persist. Further research is needed to refine LLM performance in complex linguistic contexts.

More Related Videos

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.0K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.6K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.0K
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Natural Language Processing (NLP)
  • Computational Linguistics
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Background:

  • Large language models (LLMs) excel in English NLP tasks.
  • LLM capabilities in Chinese grammatical error correction (CGEC) are largely unexplored.
  • Corpus linguistics offers a framework for evaluating LLM performance in CGEC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs for Chinese grammatical error correction (CGEC).
  • To analyze LLM performance from a corpus linguistic perspective.
  • To identify linguistic features differentiating LLM outputs from human annotators.

Main Methods:

  • LLM performance assessment using MaxMatch scores.
  • Quantitative analysis of keywords and key n-grams.
  • Qualitative analysis of syntactic and semantic dimensions.

Main Results:

  • LLMs perform better on datasets with multiple annotators than single annotators.
  • LLMs exhibit overcorrection tendencies, generating overly fluent sentences.
  • LLMs struggle with under-correction and hallucination in reasoning-intensive scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • LLMs demonstrate potential in CGEC but have limitations.
  • Future work should address LLM overcorrection and enhance semantic reasoning.
  • Refining LLMs for CGEC requires focus on nuanced linguistic correction.