Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

Genotypic Inference of HIV-1 Tropism Using Population-based Sequencing of V3
Published on: December 27, 2010
Estimation of HIV prevalence at the ZIP code-level in Atlanta, Georgia: Bayesian prediction modeling using passive
Enrique M Saldarriaga1, Anirban Basu1
1The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, H-375, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Objective:
This study aims to predict the number of undiagnosed HIV cases at the ZIP Code-level in Atlanta, Georgia, based on publicly available information.
Study Design:
Statistical modeling.
Methods:
We fitted a Bayesian hierarchical Binomial model to county-level estimates of the passive-surveillance-system. The denominator was the true total HIV cases arising from a Negative Binomial distribution. The trial probability, known as ascertainment probability, depended on socio-economic determinants of HIV, retained via feature-selection algorithms. Data were obtained from CDC's HIV report for End of the HIV Epidemic and the American Community Survey. The prediction model was assessed out-of-sample in Georgia counties. We combined socio-economic data with the posterior predictive distribution of the coefficients to predict the mean ascertainment probability and total HIV cases at the ZIP Code-level. These estimates were spatially smoothed and aggregated at the county-level for secondary validations.
Results:
The county-level model showed good mixing properties and predictive accuracy. The mean ascertainment probability calibrated to the ZIP Code-level varied from 78.4% (95% credible interval: 24.4%-99.3%) to 93.8% (95%CI: 80.6%-99.8%). Further, the predicted undiagnosed HIV cases ranged between 12 (95%CI: 6-19; ZIP Code 30322) to 1603 (95%CI 1209-1968; ZIP Code 30318).
Conclusions:
Our findings provide a more complete picture of the relative burden of HIV across ZIP codes. Such information can be used by Local Health Departments to identify underserved areas and allocate resources accordingly. Furthermore, our methodological approach can be applied to complement the information obtained from passive surveillance, especially when more resource-intensive approaches are not available or are unfeasible to employ.
More Related Videos
07:06Prediction of HIV-1 Coreceptor Usage Tropism by Sequence Analysis using a Genotypic Approach
Published on: December 1, 2011
14:23A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.