Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Liver Metastasis Receiving
Miguel Muniz1, Oliver Sartor2,3, Jacob J Orme2
1Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; munizrincon.miguel@mayo.edu.
Patients with liver metastasis receiving lutetium-177 PSMA therapy (LuPSMA) show poorer outcomes. Liver metastasis independently predicts shorter survival, highlighting the need for alternative treatments in this subgroup.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Prostate Cancer Research
Background:
- Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with liver involvement often shows limited response to systemic therapies.
- Data on outcomes for patients with liver metastases treated with lutetium-177 PSMA (LuPSMA) are limited.
- Previous trials reported hazard ratios but not absolute survival durations for this specific patient subgroup.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) in patients with mCRPC and liver metastases treated with LuPSMA.
- To compare outcomes between patients with and without liver metastases receiving LuPSMA.
- To identify prognostic factors, including liver metastasis, associated with survival in LuPSMA-treated patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of real-world clinical data from 273 patients treated with LuPSMA at a single institution.
- Patients categorized based on the presence or absence of liver metastasis on pretreatment PSMA PET/CT.
- Comparison of PSA response rates (χ² testing) and OS (Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression) between groups.
Main Results:
- 15.75% of patients had liver metastasis; they received fewer LuPSMA cycles (median 3 vs. 5).
- Lower PSA response rates were observed in patients with liver metastasis (30.23% vs. 49.77%, P=0.019).
- Median OS was significantly shorter for patients with liver metastasis (8.35 months vs. not reached, P<0.001); liver metastasis was an independent predictor of shorter survival (HR, 4.06; P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- The presence of liver metastasis is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in patients treated with LuPSMA.
- Current LuPSMA therapy demonstrates reduced efficacy in patients with liver metastases.
- Further research into alternative or combination therapies is crucial to improve outcomes for this patient subgroup.
More Related Videos
09:44Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Based on the Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reaction
Published on: January 29, 2019
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017