Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
FAP and PSMA Expression by Immunohistochemistry and PET Imaging in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A
Rong Rong Huang1, Chunlai Zuo1,2, Christine E Mona3
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) shows limited utility in advanced prostate cancer imaging due to low expression. While FAP PET may aid PSMA-negative cases, other imaging methods are needed for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Imaging
- Cancer Biology
Background:
- Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a key theranostic target for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa).
- Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) can lose PSMA expression post-therapy, necessitating alternative targets.
- Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), found in cancer-associated fibroblasts, is a potential alternative target in PCa.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
- To compare FAP expression with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in CRPC.
- To assess the potential of FAP-targeted imaging in CRPC.
Main Methods:
- Immunohistochemistry assessed FAP expression in 116 CRPC tumors across different subtypes.
- Manual and automated scoring of FAP expression were correlated.
- Paired FAP and PSMA staining analyzed in CRPC tissue microarrays (n=62).
- Preliminary analysis of 4 patients from a [68Ga]-FAPi-46 PET imaging trial.
Main Results:
- FAP expression in CRPC was significantly lower than PSMA expression (median immunoscores 14 vs. 72).
- FAP expression was comparable across CRPC histologic subtypes, unlike PSMA.
- Among PSMA-negative tumors (19), 58% showed FAP positivity.
- FAPi PET imaging showed lower uptake than PSMA PET in clinical trial patients, correlating with lower FAP expression.
Conclusions:
- Low FAP expression levels in CRPC may limit the utility of FAP inhibitor (FAPi) PET imaging.
- FAPi PET imaging could be explored for PSMA-negative CRPC, including small cell carcinoma.
- Alternative molecular imaging modalities should be investigated for CRPC.
More Related Videos
07:25A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
12:13Sequencing Small Non-coding RNA from Formalin-fixed Tissues and Serum-derived Exosomes from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients
Published on: November 19, 2019