Impact of combinatorial immunotherapies in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sandeep Sisodiya1,2, Vishakha Kasherwal1,2, Jyoti Rani1,3
1Cellular and Molecular Diagnostics (Molecular Biology Group), ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Background:
Breast cancer has the highest mortality rate among all cancers affecting females worldwide. Several new effective therapeutic strategies are being developed to minimize the number of breast cancer-related deaths and improve the quality of life of breast cancer patients. However, resistance to conventional therapies in breast cancer patients remains a challenge which could be due to several reasons, including changes in the tumor microenvironment. Attention is being diverted towards minimizing the resistance, toxicity, and improving the affordability of therapeutics for better breast cancer management. This includes personalized medicine, target-specific drug delivery systems, combinational therapies and artificial intelligence based screening and disease prediction. Nowadays, researchers and clinicians are also exploring the use of combinatorial immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, which have shown encouraging results in terms of improved survival outcomes. This study attempts to analyze the role of combinational immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, and offer insights into their effectiveness in breast cancer management.
Methodology:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for which we selected the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focused on completed Phase I/II/III/IV clinical trials investigating combination immunotherapies for breast cancer. The analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of combination therapies in comparison to mono-therapies, focusing on overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results:
We observed that, combination immunotherapies significantly (P<0.05) improved OS as compared to single-drug therapies in the Phase I with overall Risk ratio (RR) of 16.17 (CI 2.23,117.50), Phase II with an overall RR of 19.19 (CI 11.76,31.30) and for phase III overall RR 22.27 (CI 13.60,36.37). In the case of PFS, it was significant with RR: 12.35 (CI 2.14, 71.26) in Phase I RR 6.10 (CI 4.31, 8.64) in phase II, RR 8.95 (CI 6.09, 13.16) in phase III and RR 14.82 (CI 6.49, 33.82) in Phase IV of clinical trials.
Conclusion:
The observed improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival suggest that combination immunotherapies could serve as a better approach to breast cancer management.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Tumor Immunotherapy
02:50Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
01:30Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
02:57Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
02:49Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...