Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2025

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
Published on: June 7, 2017
Efficacy of Disinfectants for Monkeypox Virus Inactivation on High Touch Surface Materials in Low-Resource Settings
Ana K Pitol1, Siobhan Richards1, Patrick Mirindi2
1Departments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, L3 5QA Liverpool, U.K.
Abstract:
Disinfection efficacy tests were conducted on surface carriers inoculated with the monkeypox virus (MPXV) by applying six disinfectant solutions (and three controls) on six surfaces common in low-resource settings: four nonporous surfaces (stainless steel, glass, plastic, and latex) and two porous surfaces (ceramic and wood). Disinfectants were wiped on carriers in triplicate, with a 1 min contact time: 0.05 and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 70% ethanol, two quaternary ammonium compound (QAC)-based disinfectants, and 1.4% hydrogen peroxide. MPXV was then quantified, and log10 removal values were calculated. Sodium hypochlorite (0.05 and 0.5%) and ethanol (70%) removed MPXV to below detection level, ≥ 99.97% reduction for nonporous surfaces, and ≥99.40% for wood, QAC-based disinfectants were efficacious on nonporous surfaces (≥99.97% inactivation) but had diminished efficacy on wood, a porous surface, and 1.4% H2O2 had limited efficacy across all tested surfaces. Results varied by disinfectant type and surface type. Based on our results, we recommend using 0.05% sodium hypochlorite or 70% ethanol with 1 min contact time to inactive MPXV on clean nonporous and porous surfaces. As MPXV is evolving, future research with additional disinfectants, application methods, and environmental conditions and research to understand adsorption, disinfection efficacy, and transmission risk on porous surfaces are needed to develop practical disinfection recommendations.
Insights
0.05% sodium hypochlorite or 70% ethanol effectively disinfect monkeypox virus (MPXV) on various surfaces with a 1-minute contact time. These disinfectants offer high reduction rates, crucial for infection control in low-resource settings.
Area of Science:
- Environmental microbiology
- Infectious disease control
- Public health
Background:
- Monkeypox virus (MPXV) poses a significant public health threat, necessitating effective surface disinfection strategies.
- Understanding disinfectant efficacy on diverse surfaces is critical, especially in low-resource settings.
- Limited data exists on MPXV inactivation by common disinfectants on various surface types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the disinfection efficacy of six common disinfectants against monkeypox virus (MPXV) on multiple surface types.
- To determine optimal disinfectant choices and contact times for MPXV inactivation in practical settings.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for surface disinfection in low-resource environments.
Main Methods:
- Surface carriers inoculated with MPXV were treated with six disinfectants (0.05% and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, 70% ethanol, two QAC-based, 1.4% hydrogen peroxide) and controls.
- Disinfection was performed on six common surfaces: four nonporous (stainless steel, glass, plastic, latex) and two porous (ceramic, wood).
- MPXV was quantified post-treatment with a 1-minute contact time, and log10 removal values were calculated.
Main Results:
- Sodium hypochlorite (0.05%, 0.5%) and 70% ethanol achieved ≥99.97% MPXV reduction on nonporous surfaces and ≥99.40% on wood.
- QAC-based disinfectants were effective on nonporous surfaces (≥99.97% inactivation) but less so on wood.
- 1.4% hydrogen peroxide showed limited efficacy across all tested surfaces; results varied significantly by disinfectant and surface type.
Conclusions:
- 0.05% sodium hypochlorite or 70% ethanol are recommended for inactivating MPXV on clean nonporous and porous surfaces with a 1-minute contact time.
- Disinfectant efficacy is surface-dependent, highlighting the need for tailored disinfection protocols.
- Further research is needed on evolving MPXV strains, diverse application methods, and porous surface interactions for comprehensive disinfection guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...

