Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
Published on: November 6, 2014
Analyzing Discrepancies and Correlations in Soft and Hard Tissue Asymmetry: A Focused Study on Hemifacial Microsomia
M M Jingwen Yang1, M M Yuting Dong1, M M Senmao Wang1
1Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100144, China.
Background:
This study aims to thoroughly investigate the distinctions and relationships between facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry, as well as their variations within different conditions and age groups.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study analyzed pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images from 120 male patients aged 5 to 12 years with unilateral HFM (Pruzansky-Kaban types I and IIA) or isolated microtia. The 120 patients were categorized into four groups by condition (HFM or isolated microtia) and age (5-7, 8-12 years). Segmentation and extraction of anatomical landmarks were performed using Mimics software, followed by generating root-mean-square (RMS) values for facial asymmetry. Statistical analysis, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman correlation coefficient, was conducted to assess differences and correlations in asymmetry.
Results:
The study found that soft tissue asymmetry was generally greater than hard tissue asymmetry across all facial regions. The complexity of regional asymmetry correlations increased with age in HFM patients but decreased in isolated microtia patients. Significant correlations between hard and soft tissues were observed within the same anatomical regions, particularly in HFM patients aged 8-12 years.
Conclusion:
The intricate interplay between hard and soft tissues was observed in HFM and isolated microtia patients. Personalized analysis of the causes of asymmetry in different regions is crucial for the formulation of effective treatment plans.
Level Of Evidence Iv:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
