Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of the Skull01:08

Overview of the Skull

4.3K
The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
4.3K
Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

5.1K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
5.1K
Muscles for Facial Expressions01:14

Muscles for Facial Expressions

1.8K
The craniofacial muscles are a collection of approximately 20 thin skeletal muscles situated beneath the skin of the face and scalp. These muscles, primarily responsible for the vast array of human facial expressions, originate from the bones or fibrous structures of the skull and extend outwards to connect with the skin. While most skeletal muscles in the body are enveloped in thick fascia, facial muscles generally have a more delicate fascial covering, with the buccinator muscle being a...
1.8K
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification01:29

Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification

5.6K
Intramembranous ossification is one of the two processes involved in the development of bones within an embryo. The flat bones of the face, most of the cranial bones, and the clavicles are formed via this process. During intramembranous ossification, the bones develop directly from sheets of undifferentiated mesenchymal connective tissue.
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into ...
5.6K
Bone Markings01:26

Bone Markings

5.1K
Bones have various surface features that help form joints and attach to other soft tissues. Depending on the function, bone markings are categorized into articulating projections, processes for attachment, depressions, and openings.
Articulating Projections
Articulating projections are found where two bones meet to form a joint. These structures are usually found at the ends of bones. The largest articulation is a rounded projection called the head, supported by a narrow neck at the ends of...
5.1K
Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

6.3K
The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expert View: Scheila Mânica.

British dental journal·2026
Same author

Substance-induced dental damage.

Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes·2026
Same author

Global patterns of dental morphological variation: Revisiting ASUDAS trait frequencies.

Morphologie : bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes·2026
Same author

Assessment of evidence from teeth and the alveolar bone of skulls.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Charred or fragmented, yet comparable: Quantifying dental surface dissimilarity across teeth, jaws, and heat exposure.

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

Quantitative Characterization of Undulation Patterns and Regional Features of the Oral Basement Membrane Zone Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Journal of biophotonics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2025

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.2K

MANDI-code: A coding system for the human mandible.

Doha Abualhija1, Julieta Gómez García-Donas2, Simon Shepherd3

  • 1Centre for Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, UK.

Journal of Oral Biosciences
|November 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Standardizing mandibular measurements is crucial for accurate biological identity assessment. A new coding system enhances clarity and consistency for researchers in dentistry, archaeology, and anthropology.

Keywords:
Biological profileCoding systemForensic anthropologyForensic dentistryMandible

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

231
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2025

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.2K
Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

231
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic anthropology
  • Dental anatomy
  • Bioarchaeology

Background:

  • The mandible is key for determining biological identity.
  • Inconsistent terminology and measurement methods cause confusion in mandibular analysis.
  • Lack of standardization hinders accurate interpretation and communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the ambiguity in mandibular measurement terminology.
  • To propose a standardized coding system for anatomical points, planes, and measurements of the mandible.
  • To improve clarity, reproducibility, and comparability in mandibular studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing mandibular measurement terminologies.
  • Development of a novel, comprehensive coding system for mandibular anatomical landmarks.
  • Validation of the proposed system through application in diverse research contexts.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant inconsistencies in current mandibular measurement terminology.
  • Established a standardized set of anatomical points and planes for mandible analysis.
  • Demonstrated the utility of the proposed coding system in enhancing clarity.

Conclusions:

  • A standardized coding system for mandibular anatomy is essential for accurate biological profiling.
  • The proposed system facilitates reproducibility and comparability across studies in dentistry, archaeology, and anthropology.
  • This standardization will reduce misinterpretation and improve interdisciplinary communication.